BERGENFIELD, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: MINGO CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of MINGO CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 404 SOUTH PROSPECT AVE., BERGENFIELD, NJ 07621 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343437240.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MINGO CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 404 SOUTH PROSPECT AVE.
- City
- BERGENFIELD
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07621
- Mailing
- 391 VALLEY ROAD, WEST ORANGE, NJ 07052
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,049 · Current $3,049
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) Exterior Roof of Two Story Frame Home: Employees engaged in roofing operations (installing shingles) were using hand-held pneumatic nail guns without eye and face protection. The employer did not ensure that employees were protected with eye and face protection, on or about 9/4/18.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3049
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $4,268 · Current $4,268
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Exterior Roof of Two Story Frame Home: Employees engaged in roofing work were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 25 feet above the ground surface, without the use of a personal fall arrest system. The employer did not ensure that affected employees were provided with a personal fall arrest system, or other means of fall protection, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard, on or about 9/4/18.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4268
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 28, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,439 · Current $2,439
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) Exterior Roof of Two Story Frame Home: Employees engaged in roofing operations (installing shingles) were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 25 feet above the ground surface while using a 24 foot aluminum frame extension ladder that was not extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing, on or about 9/4/18.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2439
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343437240.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.