Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SPG CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of SPG CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 9140 E TALKING STICK WAY, SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85256 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 343447140.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch SPG Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SPG Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9140 E TALKING STICK WAY
City
SCOTTSDALE
State
AZ
ZIP
85256
Mailing
6331 W VAN BUREN ST, PHOENIX, AZ 85043
Inspection type
Programmed Related (J)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2018
Abate by
Sep 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $9,701
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not constructed in accordance with the design by a qualified person:    (a) SCAFFOLD: The employer did not ensure that scaffolding placed into service was constructed according to the design of a qualified person, exposing employees to falls from elevations. 29 CFR 1926.451(b)(10): Scaffold components manufactured by different manufacturers were modified in order to intermix them and a competent person did not determine that the resulting scaffold was structurally sound:    (a) SCAFFOLD: Modified scaffolding manufactured by different manufacturers, was placed into service without being inspected by a competent person to ensure it was structurally sound, exposing employees to falls from elevations.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $9700.5
  • — C (S) $6467
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2018
Abate by
Sep 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.      (a) SCAFFOLD: Employees performing stucco operations from a fabricated frame scaffold did not use an acceptable means of access. An employee was observed climbing the scaffold exterior and the cross-bracing to access the scaffold.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6467
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2018
Abate by
Sep 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:     (a) SCAFFOLD: Employees engaged in stucco operations worked from a supported scaffold which did not have toeboards erected along the edge of platforms to prevent employees on lower levels from being struck by overhead tools, materials or equipment.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6467
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.452 C02

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2018
Abate by
Sep 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $6,467
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): All brace connections were not secured:    (a) SCAFFOLD: Employees performing stucco operations worked from a supported scaffold which did not have frames and panels adequately secured by horizontal braces, exposing employees to falls.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $6467
  • — C (S) $6467
  • — Z (S) $6467

View SPG Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343447140.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.