Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: OCEAN ROOFING OF FLORIDA LLC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of OCEAN ROOFING OF FLORIDA LLC. in 4575 EMERSON PARK DRIVE, ORLANDO, FL 32839 (NAICS 423330). OSHA activity number 343449179.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ocean Roofing of Florida LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ocean Roofing of Florida LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4575 EMERSON PARK DRIVE
City
ORLANDO
State
FL
ZIP
32839
Mailing
7618 LOON AVE, WINTER GARDEN, FL 34787
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423330
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2018
Abate by
Dec 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,878 · Current $2,439 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a. On or about 09/06/2018, at the job site, employees were not provided hard hats while roofing material was being thrown from the roof of a 3 story building into trash container that was being lifted by an aerial lift. The employees on the ground were picking up debris & trash directly under the area where the old roofing materials were being thrown into the container.  b. On or about 09/07/2018, at the job site, employees were not provided hard hats while roofing material was being thrown from the roof of a 3 story building into trash container that was being lifted by an aerial lift. The employees on the ground were picking up debris & trash directly under the area where the old roofing materials were being thrown into the container.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2439
  • — Z (S) $4878

1926.451 G03 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2018
Abate by
Dec 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,691 · Current $2,846 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(iv): Vertical lifelines, independent support lines, and suspension ropes were attached to the same point on the scaffold or personal fall arrest system:   a.  On or about 09/06/18, on the roof of building 4575, employees attached two lifelines to a single temper roof anchor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2845.5
  • — Z (S) $5691

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2018
Abate by
Dec 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,691 · Current $2,846 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:  a.  On or about 09/06/2018, at the jobsite, the operator of JLG aerial lift was not wearing a safety harness or body belt while operating the lift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2845.5
  • — Z (S) $5691

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2018
Abate by
Dec 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  a. On or about 09/06/2018, at the jobsite, untrained employees were allowed to operate a JLG aerial lift.  b. On or about 09/07/2018, at the jobsite, untrained employees were allowed to operate a JLG aerial lift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:  a. On or about 9/7/2018, at the jobsite, an employee operating an aerial lift used rope as safety lanyard for his personal fall arrest system and the rope was rigged where the employee could fall more than 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2018
Abate by
Dec 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,065 · Current $2,033 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not  independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee:  a. On or about 09/06/2018, at the jobsite, the Guardian temper roof anchors being used by employees doing roofing work were not installed per the manufacture's recommendation, in that, the required number of fasteners (12) were not used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2032.5
  • — Z (S) $4065

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 14 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2018
Abate by
Dec 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii):  a. On or about 09/06/2018, at the jobsite, employees working on a 5:12 pitched roof were not trained on fall protection and the employees were exposed to a 30 foot fall hazard.   b. On or about 09/07/2018, at the jobsite, employees working on a 5:12 pitched roof were not trained on fall protection and the employees were exposed to a 30 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2018
Abate by
Dec 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,691 · Current $2,846 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a. On or about 08/21/2018, at the job site - the rails of the ladder used to access the roof of the building did not extend at least 3 foot above the upper landing surface, exposing the employees to about an 10 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2845.5
  • — Z (S) $5691

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2018
Abate by
Dec 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, enabling each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  a.  On or about 08/21/2018, at the job site - employees required to use a ladder to access the roof of the building were not provided with training. The employees were exposed to about a 10 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2018
Abate by
Dec 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $56,908 · Current $28,454 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a. On or about 09/06/2018, at the jobsite, employees doing residential roofing work on a 5:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling approximately 30 feet to the ground below.    OCEAN ROOFING OF FLORIDA LLC WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD OR ITS EQUIVALENT STANDARD 29 CFR 1926.501(B)(13), WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 1114746, CITATION NUMBER 01, ITEM NUMBER 001 AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON 06/13/2016, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 3140 57TH AVE CIRCLE EAST, BRADENTON, FL 34203.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W) $28454
  • — Z (W) $56908

1926.502 D21

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Nov 28, 2018
Abate by
Dec 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $456 · Current $228 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service:  a. On or about 09/06/2018, at the jobsite, the fall protection equipment provided to employees was not inspected prior to the equipment being installed and used on a 5:12 pitch roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $228
  • — Z (O) $456

View Ocean Roofing of Florida LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343449179.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.