WICHITA, KS —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE LOPEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE LOPEZ in 10701 E BOSTON, WICHITA, KS 67207 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343453791.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE LOPEZ
- Site address
- 10701 E BOSTON
- City
- WICHITA
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 67207
- Mailing
- 1540 N.EMPORIA, WICHITA, KS 67214
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $415 · Current $415
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. The employer has not certified to OSHA for the following item(s) cited in inspection #1345379 Citation #1 Item #1; 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): Abatement was due 10/05/2018 Citation #1 Item #2; 29 CFR 1926.100(a): Abatement was due 10/05/2018 Citation #1 Item #3; 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Abatement was due 10/05/2018 Citation #1 Item #4; 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Abatement was due 10/05/2018 Citation #1 Item #5; 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Abatement was due 10/05/2018
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $415
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $3,696
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. Employees engaged in residential roofing activities were exposed to fall and struck-by hazards in that the employer did not maintain an adequate safety program that would ensure a safe and healthful working environment for employees.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3696
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,956 · Current $2,956
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: At the jobsite located at 10701 E. Boston, Wichita, KS: Employees engaged in ground hand activities working below employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to struck-by hazards in that head protection was not provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2956
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: At the jobsite located at 10701 E. Boston, Wichita, Ks: Employees engaged in residential roofing activities using a pneumatic nailer were exposed to struck-by hazards in that eye protection was not provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $3,696
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): At the jobsite located at 10701 E. Boston, Wichita, KS: Employees engaged in residential roofing activities from at least a 6:12 pitch roof were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet from the eave of the residence to the ground below in that fall protection was not provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3696
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 11, 2018
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $3,696
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): 29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: At the jobsite located at 10701 E. Boston, Wichita, Kansas: Employees engaged in residential roofing activities from a 6:12 pitch roof were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 11 feet from the eave of the residence to the ground below while accessing and exiting the roof in that the portable ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing and was not secured to the residence.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3696
More inspections at Jose Lopez
View Jose Lopez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in KS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343453791.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.