Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JUNIOR CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUNIOR CONSTRUCTION in 506 W. SAINT LOUIS ST., DE SOTO, MO 63020 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343456315.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Junior Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Junior Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JUNIOR CONSTRUCTION
Site address
506 W. SAINT LOUIS ST.
City
DE SOTO
State
MO
ZIP
63020
Mailing
1500 E. MAIN ST., PARK HILLS, MO 63601
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Oct 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $732 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    No hard hats were worn, or were available, for two employees working below and around the apartment building at 506 W. St. Louis St., De Soto, MO on 6-11-18, where hand tools and materials were used by employees working on the three story building installing new roofing.    Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $732
  • — C (S) $1663
  • — Z (S) $1663

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $734 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest system:    Three employees installing roofing panels on the three story apartment building at 506 W. St. Louis St., De Soto, MO on 6-11-18, and who were wearing harnesses, were not connected to lanyards that were available and were said to be anchored.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $734
  • — C (S) $2772
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Oct 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Three employees installing roofing panels on the three story apartment building at 506 W. St. Louis St., De Soto, MO on 6-11-18, and who were wearing harnesses, but were not connected to lanyards that were available and were said to be anchored, had not received site specific training on how fall protection was to be made.  No fall protection training had been provided according to and covering the required elements of the standard, 1926.503(a)(2)(i) through (viii).  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Abate by
Oct 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  There was no fall protection training, documented according to the requirements of the standard, for the three employees installing roofing panels on the three story apartment building at 506 W. St. Louis St., De Soto, MO on 6-11-18, and who were wearing harnesses, but were not connected to lanyards that were available and were said to be anchored.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)  Where employees were installing roofing panels on the three story apartment building at 506 W. St. Louis St., De Soto, MO on 6-11-18, and were not connected to lanyards, ground men were not wearing hard hats, and an employee climbed an extension ladder without maintaining three point contact at all times, there was no site inspection conducted by a competent person.  (Note: competency is defined for fall protection and ladder use at 1926.503(a)(2)(i) through (viii) and 1926.1060(a)(1)(i) through (v).)  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B21

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $734 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(21): Employees were not grasping the ladder with at least one hand when progressing up and/or down the ladder:    During roofing work at 506 W. St. Louis St., De Soto, MO on 9-11-18, an employee climbed an extension ladder while holding an approximate 20 ft metal panel, in order to hand the panel to the employees on the roof.  The employee did not maintain three points of contact with the ladder at all times.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $734
  • — C (S) $2217
  • — Z (S) $2217

View Junior Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343456315.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.