Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: NICOLE MONTALVO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NICOLE MONTALVO in 55-1/2 MAIN STREET, BINGHAMTON, NY 13905 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343466025.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nicole Montalvo for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nicole Montalvo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NICOLE MONTALVO
Site address
55-1/2 MAIN STREET
City
BINGHAMTON
State
NY
ZIP
13905
Mailing
222 MAIN STREET, BINGHAMTON, NY 13905
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    a) 55-1/2 Main Street, back building, north side, on or about 9-14-18:  Two employees were working on a sloped roof and were not protected from falls, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 25 feet from the gable end.     b) 55-1/2 Main Street, back building, north side, on or about 9-14-18:  Two employees were working on a sloped roof and were not protected from falls, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 13feet 1 inch from the eave.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2772

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    a) 55-1/2 Main Street, back building, north side, on or about 9-14-18:  Two employees were using two portable aluminum ladders for roof access/egress, with side rails that were 42 inches below the landing surface, exposing the employees to a fall hazard 13 feet 1 inch (eave to ground) from the top of the 20 foot section of ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2217

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:    a) 55-1/2 Main Street, back building, north side, on or about 9-14-18:  Two employees were using a portable aluminum ladder that was split into two sections, and side rails without feet, resting on the asphalt surface, not as designed or for it intended purpose, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 13 feet 1 inch (eave to ground) from the top of the 20 foot section of ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 15, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder:    a) 55-1/2 Main Street, back building, north side, on or about 9-14-18:  Two employees were using a portable aluminum ladder that was split into two sections, and the angle of the ladder was such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was more than one quarter the length of the ladder side rails, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of 13 feet 1 inch (eave to ground) from the top of the 20 foot section of ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343466025.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.