SAINT LOUIS, MO —
OSHA Inspection: URIEL MENDOZA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of URIEL MENDOZA in 1453 ANDREW DR., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63122 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343467676.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- URIEL MENDOZA
- Site address
- 1453 ANDREW DR.
- City
- SAINT LOUIS
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63122
- Mailing
- 3811 GUSTINE AVE, APT 2, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63116
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $5,174
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measures: On or about 9/12/2018, at the jobsite at 1453 Andrew Drive, St Louis, MO, workers were observed on top of the residential roof, approximately 17 feet (upper level) and 8 feet 5 inches (lower level) eave to ground, actively removing old roof material and were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measures. The workers were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $3,696
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where a portable ladder was used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device, such as a grab rail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: On or about 09/12/2018, at the jobsite at 1453 Andrew Drive, St Louis, MO, workers were using an aluminum ladder to gain access to the roof, the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet above upper landing surface, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device, such as a grab rail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. The workers were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3696
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343467676.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.