Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HERNANDEZ STUCCO LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HERNANDEZ STUCCO LLC in 109 CARSON ST, LEES SUMMIT, MO 64063 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 343494712.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hernandez Stucco LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hernandez Stucco LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
109 CARSON ST
City
LEES SUMMIT
State
MO
ZIP
64063
Mailing
2106 N 27TH STREET, KANSAS CITY, KS 66104
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $4,774 · Current $4,774
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with scaffolding during stucco installation preparation and stucco installation.  This was most recently documented on or about September 26, 2018 at the residential construction site, located at 109 Carson St, Lees Summit, Missouri.  Scaffold platforms were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4774

1926.451 E06

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $4,774 · Current $4,774
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(6): Integral prefabricated scaffold access frames did not meet the requirements of paragraphs (e)(6)(i)-(vi) of this section:  The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with using integral prefabricated scaffold access frames during stucco installation preparation and stucco installation.  This was most recently documented on or about September 26, 2018 at the residential construction site, located at 109 Carson St, Lees Summit, Missouri.  The Integral scaffold access were not specifically designed and constructed for use as ladder rungs in that rungs were not all at lease eight inches in length and uniform.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4774

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $4,774 · Current $4,774
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with using tubular prefabricated scaffold frames during stucco installation preparation and stucco installation.  This was most recently documented on or about September 26, 2018 at the residential construction site, located at 109 Carson St, Lees Summit, Missouri.  The tubular prefabricated scaffold frames were not equipped with guardrails and employees wore no personal fall arrest system to protect from approximate 13 foot fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4774

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $4,774 · Current $4,774
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   (a) The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with stucco installation preparation and stucco installation.  This was most recently documented on or about September 26, 2018 at the residential construction site, located at 109 Carson St, Lees Summit, Missouri. An employee wearing no personal fall arrest system was working from a roof overhang above the garage while taping plastic over a window. The employee was expose to  fall hazard greater than 6 foot.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4774

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343494712.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.