WILMINGTON, DE —
OSHA Inspection: A.R. MYERS CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of A.R. MYERS CORPORATION in 1300 E. 8TH STREET, WILMINGTON, DE 19801 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 343497244.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- A.R. MYERS CORPORATION
- Site address
- 1300 E. 8TH STREET
- City
- WILMINGTON
- State
- DE
- ZIP
- 19801
- Mailing
- 1300 E. 8TH STREET, WILMINGTON, DE 19801
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,774 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Body Shop - The company did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees who were required to use respirators during spray painting operations. Observed on or about September 27, 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1774
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Body Shop - Employees who use respirators during spray painting and grinding operations were not provided with a medical evaluation prior to respirator usage. Observed on or about September 27, 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) Body Shop - Employees required to use dual cartridge respirators during spray painting were not provided with respirator fit tests prior to use of the respirators. Observed on or about September 27, 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: a) Body Shop - the employer did not provide respirator training to all employees who were required to use respirators while working in the body shop. Observed on or about September 27, 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,774 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Body Shop - The company did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees who were exposed to hazardous chemicals, including Finish Pro 5000 General Purpose Thinner. Observed on or about September 27, 2018. Abatement Note: A written program shall include descriptions of how the criteria for the following will be met: 1. Labeling and other forms of warning 2. Safety Data Sheets 3. Employee information and training Additionally, a list of hazardous chemicals known to be present in the work place must be compiled. Methods used to inform employees of the hazards associated with non-routine tasks and the informing of contractors of workplace hazard must also be addressed. The written program must be made available upon request.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1774
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical: a) Body Shop - The employer did not maintain in the workplace a copy of the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for each hazardous chemical used in the workplace, including Finish Pro #5000 General Purpose Thinner. Observed on or about September 27, 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Body Shop - employees were not provided with training on the hazardous chemicals in the workplace, including paints, paint thinner, and MIG wire. Observed on or about September 27, 2018
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): a) Body Shop - The employer did not certify that the employee who was authorized to operate the forklift had been trained and evaluated in accordance with the requirements of 1910.178(l)(2) and (l)(3). Observed on or about September 27, 2018.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in DE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343497244.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.