Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NAKSH HOSPITALITY LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NAKSH HOSPITALITY LLC in 860 S PORTER STREET, MANCHESTER, NH 03103 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 343503082.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Naksh Hospitality LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Naksh Hospitality LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
860 S PORTER STREET
City
MANCHESTER
State
NH
ZIP
03103
Mailing
860 S PORTER STREET, MANCHESTER, NH 03103
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
26
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2018
Abate by
Nov 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $8,315 · Current $4,989 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):    Site- Workers under control of the employer were not protected from fall and electrocution hazards where the employer did not provide for frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to be conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4989
  • — Z (S) $8315

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2018
Abate by
Nov 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  Site- Workers under the control of the employer were not protected from scaffold collapse and fall hazards where tubular welded frame scaffolds were not inspected by a competent person before each work shift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2018
Abate by
Nov 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:  Site- Workers under the control of the employer were not protected from scaffold collapse and fall hazards where tubular welded frame scaffolds were not erected under the supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2018
Abate by
Nov 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,989 · Current $2,994 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs,  debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures:    Site- Workers under the control of the employer were not protected from trip hazards where debris, tools, and equipment was not kept clear of walking surfaces around the exterior of the building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2994
  • — Z (S) $4989

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2018
Abate by
Nov 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $8,315 · Current $4,989 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:    Site- Workers under the control of the employer were not protected from fall hazards where they were not using fall protection while operating aerial lifts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4989
  • — Z (S) $8315

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343503082.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.