Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RELOAD CENTRAL

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RELOAD CENTRAL in 6700 WILSON AVE, KANSAS CITY, MO 64123 (NAICS 423310). OSHA activity number 343504635.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Reload Central — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Reload Central is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RELOAD CENTRAL
Site address
6700 WILSON AVE
City
KANSAS CITY
State
MO
ZIP
64123
Mailing
6700 WILSON AVE, KANSAS CITY, MO 64123
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423310
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2019
Abate by
Mar 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,591 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  Employee's were exposed to struck by hazards from forklifts. Forklift operators were not trained with training consisting of formal instruction, and practical training and evaluation. There was no written and practical evaluation of the forklift operator's driving.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1591.1
  • — Z (S) $2273

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2019
Abate by
Mar 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation:  Employee's were exposed to struck by hazards from forklifts. There was no forklift written operator training certification included the name of the operator, date of training, and identity of the person(s) giving the training or evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2019
Abate by
Mar 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,591 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):  a) Employees were exposed to struck by hazards as the Doosan 45 Propane forklift had a brake pedal without a nonskid cover and the backup alarm was not working.  The Doosan forklift had not been taken out of service until it was in safe operating condition.   b) Employees were exposed to struck by hazards as the Doosan Diesel forklift Driver's left light was not working.  The Doosan forklift had not been taken out of service until it was in safe operating condition.  c)  Employees were exposed to struck by hazards as the Nissan Diesel forklift, the front lights were not working.  The Nissan MWG forklift was not taken out of service until it was in safe operating condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1591.1
  • — Z (S) $2273

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2019
Abate by
Mar 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,591 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Employees are exposed to chemical hazards.  There was no written hazard communication program when employees are exposed to propane and diesel.  There was no written hazard communication to explain how chemicals would be labelled, how safety data sheets would be maintained, and training given.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1591.1
  • — Z (S) $2273

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 5, 2019
Abate by
Mar 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Employees are exposed to chemical hazards.  Employees were not trained on the hazards of chemicals when they are exposed to propane and diesel fuel.  Both propane and diesel fuel are flammable chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343504635.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.