Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SAEILO MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SAEILO MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES in 130 GODDARD MEMORIAL DR, WORCESTER, MA 01603 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 343516977.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Saeilo Manufacturing Industries — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Saeilo Manufacturing Industries is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
130 GODDARD MEMORIAL DR
City
WORCESTER
State
MA
ZIP
01603
Mailing
130 GODDARD MEMORIAL DR, WORCESTER, MA 01603
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2018
Abate by
Feb 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $2,587 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:     130 Goddard Memorial Dr., Worcester, MA: On October 5, 2018 and at times prior, employees performing maintenance and servicing on machines did not utilize the documented energy control procedures.  On October 5, 2018, an employee performing maintenance on a pneumatic component on a machine removed the quick-disconnect coupler to the pneumatic energy source but did not apply the isolating device and lock.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2587
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2018
Abate by
Feb 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy.  130 Goddard Memorial Dr., Worcester, MA: On October 5, 2018 and at times prior, the employer's energy control procedures did not specify the steps to shut down, isolate, and secure machines to control hazardous energy.  The employer developed a two-page hazardous energy control inventory for approximately thirty machines and the inventory listed the same method (disconnect at machine) to control electrical and pneumatic energy sources for most of the machines.  Some machines had multiple electrical disconnect locations to choose from and machines either used quick disconnects or lever ball valves to isolate pneumatic energy and the procedures did not specify using isolation devices or locks.  On October 5, 2018, an employee performing maintenance on a machine only disconnected the pneumatic energy source as was listed in the procedure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2018
Abate by
Mar 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $2,587 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    130 Goddard Memorial Dr., Worcester, MA: As of October 5, 2018 and for eighteen months prior, the employer had not performed a periodic inspection that ensured each procedure was inspected for inaccuracies during an actual energy control task.  The employer also did not ensure that the inspector reviewed each authorized employee's responsibilities under each energy control procedure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2587
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 13, 2018
Abate by
Feb 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,478 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    130 Goddard Memorial Dr., Worcester, MA    On October 5, 2018 and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that an employee who voluntarily used a half face elastomeric respirator when deburring metal parts was medically able to use the respirator and that the respirator was properly cleaned, stored, and maintained.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1478
  • — Z (S) $2956

View Saeilo Manufacturing Industries's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343516977.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.