Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LEONEL RIVERA

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of LEONEL RIVERA in 4000 RIDGE PIKE, COLLEGEVILLE, PA 19426 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343520607.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Leonel Rivera — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Leonel Rivera is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LEONEL RIVERA
Site address
4000 RIDGE PIKE
City
COLLEGEVILLE
State
PA
ZIP
19426
Mailing
11 BERNICE ROAD, NORTH ARLINGTON, NJ 07031
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.302 B06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Abate by
Apr 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $4,376 · Current $4,376
29 CFR 1926.302(b)(6): The use of hoses for hoisting or lowering tools was permitted:  a) Construction site, wing C1, room 2026, second floor - On or about October 4, 2018, an employee lowered a Hitachi pneumatic nail gun with an air hose from the rafters of the second floor.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4376

1926.452 W02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Penalty
Initial $8,752 · Current $8,752
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2): Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner:  a) Construction site, second floor - On or about October 4, 2018, employees used a mobile scaffold that had inoperative wheel locks to work at approximately five feet above the lower level and to access an elevated work area in the trusses .
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $8752

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Abate by
Apr 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:   a) Construction site, wing C1 second floor - On or about October 4, 2018, employees used a mobile scaffold to access an elevated work area in the rafters that was more than four feet above the scaffold.  b) Construction site, room 2026, wing C1 second floor - On or about October 4, 2018, an employee used an eight foot stepladder to access an elevated work area in the rafters that was more than two feet above the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B14

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Penalty
Initial $7,293 · Current $7,293
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14): Each employee working on, at, above, or near wall openings (including those with chutes attached), where the outside bottom edge of the wall opening was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels and the inside bottom edge of the wall opening is less than 39 inches (1.0 M) above the walking/working surface, is not protected from falling by the use of a guardrail system, a safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system:  a) Construction site, second floor - On or about October 4, 2018, employees walked and worked near the perimeter of the second floor where the wall opening between unsheathed studs was more than 22 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $7293

1926.501 B01

Willful Gravity 10 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Abate by
Apr 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $102,100 · Current $102,100
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  a) Construction site, Wing C1 northeast corner- On or about October 4, 2018, an employee completing installation of trusses worked from the truss ceiling joist and wall top plate of the second floor without utilizing any form of fall protection, exposing him to fall hazards to the interior and exterior of the structure ranging from 10 to 22 feet.  b) Construction site, Wing C1 west side - On or about October 4, 2018, two employees completing installation of trusses worked from the trusses, truss ceiling joists, and top plate of the second floor without utilizing any form of fall protection, exposing them to fall hazards at the interior of the structure of more than 10 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (W) $102100

1926.1053 B13

Willful Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Abate by
Apr 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $87,512 · Current $87,512
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:  a) Construction site, Wing C1 northeast corner- On or about October 4, 2018, an employee used the top and top step of a stepladder to access an elevated work area.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (W) $87512

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Abate by
Apr 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  a) Construction site - On or about October 4, 2018, the employer did not have certification of employee fall protection training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Leonel Rivera's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343520607.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.