FORT WORTH, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ROJAS RODRIGUEZ CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROJAS RODRIGUEZ CONSTRUCTION in 1116 METALLINE, FORT WORTH, TX 76131 (NAICS 238350). OSHA activity number 343526505.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROJAS RODRIGUEZ CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 1116 METALLINE
- City
- FORT WORTH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76131
- Mailing
- 4058 LIPSCOMB ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76110
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238350
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $1,413 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. On the east side of the construction site, employees engaged in decking activities used pneumatic nail guns and were not wearing eye and face protection exposing them to struck-by hazards and eye injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1413
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). On the east side of the construction site, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 10 feet while engaged in decking activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Oct 23, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided. On the east side of the construction site, the employer did not provide an extension ladder where employees could access and egress the residential home upper landing exposing the employees to potential fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2217
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238350)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343526505.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.