Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MACIEL CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MACIEL CONSTRUCTION in 3017 SEA OATS DR., LONG BEACH, MS 39560 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 343531893.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Maciel Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Maciel Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MACIEL CONSTRUCTION
Site address
3017 SEA OATS DR.
City
LONG BEACH
State
MS
ZIP
39560
Mailing
19706 BRIGHTON DR., SAUCIER, MS 39574
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2019
Abate by
Feb 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,439 · Current $1,463 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide:    (a) Front of house - On or before October 15, 2018 employees framing a new single family dwelling were working from the walkway plank that's 5 1/2 inches wide and not the 18 inches required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1463.4
  • — Z (S) $2439

1926.451 B03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2019
Abate by
Feb 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,439 · Current $1,463 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3): The front edge of all platforms was not 14 inches (36 cm) or less from the face of the work, and no guardrail systems were erected along the front edge and/or no personal fall arrest systems were used in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section to protect employees from falling.Note:  See exceptions in paragraphs (b)(3)(i) and (ii) of this section.    (a) Front of house - On or about October 15, 2018 employees were framing a new house while working from a walk way plank that was 24 inches away from the face of the house and not the 14 inches required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1463.4
  • — Z (S) $2439

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2019
Abate by
Feb 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,439 · Current $1,463 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    (a) Front of house and rear of house - On or about October 15, 2018 employees framing a new house gained access to the roof using an aluminum extension ladder that did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1463.4
  • — Z (S) $2439

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2019
Abate by
Feb 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) Front of house - On or about October 15, 2018 employees used a 6 foot fiberglass step ladder to gain access to the scaffolding plank that did not extend 3 feet past the upper level surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Willful Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2019
Abate by
Feb 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $28,454 · Current $17,067 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.     (a) East and West side of house - On or about October 15, 2018 two employees were applying plywood deck sheeting to the steep roof rafters that at the lowest point it is 9 feet 4 inches high without any type of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W) $17067.2
  • — Z (W) $28454

1926.100 A

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2019
Abate by
Feb 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  (a) Front of house - On or about October 15, 2018 employees building a new house had an employee on the ground below the roof framers handing material up to the without the use of any head protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.102 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2019
Abate by
Feb 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $351 · Current $211 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.    (a) Throughout the job site - On or about October 15, 2018 employee framing a new house were using pneumatic air nail guns that have 100lbs of air pressure without the use of eye or face protection as required per manufacturer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $210.6
  • — Z (O) $351

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2019
Abate by
Feb 22, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  (a) Throughout the job site - On or about October 15, 2018 employees framing a new house were working from heights greater than 6 feet high with no fall protection or training to help them understand when to use fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1060 A

Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2019
Abate by
Feb 14, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  (a) Front and rear of house - On or before October 15, 2018 employees framing a new house were using portable ladders to gain access to the house without any training to be able to recognize any dangers in the ladders usage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343531893.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.