Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ARTURO CASAS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARTURO CASAS in 3 SYCAMORE COURT, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72223 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 343534384.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Arturo Casas — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Arturo Casas is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ARTURO CASAS
Site address
3 SYCAMORE COURT
City
LITTLE ROCK
State
AR
ZIP
72223
Mailing
703 SECOND AVE, CONWAY, AR 72032
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    On or about October 16, 2018, and at times prior thereto, at the job site, the employer did not ensure that employees walking and working on a scaffold and ground level where overhead hazards existed were protected by hardhats from impact of falling or flying overhead objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:   On or about October 16, 2018, and at times prior thereto, employees worked from a supported scaffold which did not have toeboards erected along the edge of platforms.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary:    On or about October 16, and at times prior thereto, at the job site, where employees worked from a supported scaffold to perform masonry activities which had excessive spacing between planks of greater than 1-inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.451 B02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2)(i): Each ladder jack scaffold, top plate bracket scaffold, roof bracket scaffold, and pump jack scaffold was not at least 12 inches (30 cm) wide:  On or about October 16, 2018, and at times prior thereto, at the job site on a scaffold, where the top walking and working platform was 6-inches in width.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(4): Each end of a platform, not cleated or otherwise restrained by hooks or equivalent means, did not extend over the centerline of its support at least 6 inches (15 cm):   On or about October 16, 2018, and at times prior thereto, at the jobsite, where employees worked from a supported scaffold to perform masonry activities, which had insufficient overhang of supports or cleating.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:      On or about October 16, 2018, and at times prior thereto, at the jobsite, employees installing stone veneer on the exterior of a residential structure from a scaffold were exposed to an 11.63-foot fall without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews:   On or about October 16, 2018, and at times prior thereto, at the job site, employees were observed performing masonry activities from the top planking of the supported scaffold without guardrails on the open side and ends.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 C03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 12, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(3): Frames and panels were not joined together vertically by coupling or stacking pins or equivalent means:  On or about October 16, 2019, and at times prior thereto, at the job site, employees occupied a supported scaffold to perform masonry activities, and frames were not secured together by fasteners.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343534384.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.