Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FAIRFIELD GOURMET FOODS CORP.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of FAIRFIELD GOURMET FOODS CORP. in 11 CLIFFSIDE DRIVE, CEDAR GROVE, NJ 07009 (NAICS 311821). OSHA activity number 343537502.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fairfield Gourmet Foods Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fairfield Gourmet Foods Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11 CLIFFSIDE DRIVE
City
CEDAR GROVE
State
NJ
ZIP
07009
Mailing
11 CLIFFSIDE DRIVE, CEDAR GROVE, NJ 07009
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311821
Employees
200
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2019
Abate by
Apr 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $8,335 · Current $4,167 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    a) 11 Cliffside Dr., Cedar Grove, NJ    The employeer did not perform a hazard assessment to determine the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) required for employees who use chemicals including but not limited to, Chlorinated Plus and Sani-T-10 Plus.      Condition occurred on or about 12/12/2018
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4167
  • — Z (S) $8335

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2019
Abate by
Apr 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $12,503 · Current $6,252 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a)  Cliffside Dr., Cedar Grove, NJ    The employer did not utilize lockout procedures for the control of hazardous energy for employees who sanitize equipment.       Conditions observed on or about 12/12/18
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6252
  • — Z (S) $12503

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2019
Abate by
Apr 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that employees acquired the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage and removal of energy control devices:  a)  Cliffside Dr., Cedar Grove, NJ  The employer did not train sanitation employees to utilize lockout procedures for the control of hazardous energy during cleaning of equipment, including but not limited to mixers.  Conditions observed on or about 12/12/18
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06

Serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2019
Abate by
Apr 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,169 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed:    a)  All Facilities    The employer did not perform an annual evaluation of energy control procedures.      Conditions observed on or about 12/12/18
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (O) $1169

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $8,335 · Current $5,795 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    (a)Production area    The employer did not guard Reiser VEMAG 12" Rotary Sheeting Horn to prevent employees from contacting the point of operation.   On 10/2/18, an employee was injured when he attempted to remove sugar lump that was stuck in depositor.      Condition occurred on or about 10/2/18
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5795
  • — Z (S) $8335

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2019
Abate by
Apr 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $12,503 · Current $6,251 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) 11 Cliffside Dr., Cedar Grove, NJ    The employeer did not develop, implement and maintain a written hazard communication program for employees who sanitize equipment and are exposed to chemicals including but not limited to, Chlorinated Plus and Sani-T-10 Plus.    Condition occurred on or about 12/12/2018
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6251
  • — Z (S) $12503

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2019
Abate by
Apr 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) 11 Cliffside Dr., Cedar Grove, NJ  The employer did not provide training to employees who sanitize equipment and are exposed to chemicals, including but not limited to, Chlorinated Plus and Sani-T-10 Plus.  Condition occurred on or about 12/12/2018
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.30 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 450 exposed
Issued
Mar 12, 2019
Abate by
Apr 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,085 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.30(a): 29 CFR 1904.30 (a): The employer did not keep a separate OSHA 300 log for each establishment:    a)  Fairfield Gourmet Food Corp.    The employer did not maintain a separate log for each establishment, including but not limited to, the 11 Cliffside Dr., Cedar Grove and 17 Stewart Pl., Fairfield locations.    Condition observed on or about 10/17/18
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $2085

View Fairfield Gourmet Foods Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343537502.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.