Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: GEORGIA PLATING TECHNOLOGY, LLC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of GEORGIA PLATING TECHNOLOGY, LLC in 3509 45TH ST SW, LANETT, AL 36863 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 343573358.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Georgia Plating Technology, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Georgia Plating Technology, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3509 45TH ST SW
City
LANETT
State
AL
ZIP
36863
Mailing
3509 45TH ST SW, LANETT, AL 36863
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
20
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Abate by
Feb 25, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 072014301860C113

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a)    Lab area, maintenance and dip tank area:  On or about December 1, 2018 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to health hazards from required use of a respirator and do not have a written respiratory protection program to include annual fit tests, medical evaluations and training on respirators and respirator care, maintenance and storage.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Abate by
Apr 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 072014301860C113

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      a)    Lab area, maintenance and dip tank area:  On or about December 1, 2018 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that employees were required to wear a tight fitting half face negative pressure respirator without first being medically evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Abate by
Apr 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 072014301860C113

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:     a)    Lab area, maintenance and dip tank area:  On or about December 1, 2018 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that employees were required to wear a tight fitting half face negative pressure respirator without first being fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Abate by
Feb 25, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 072014301860C113

29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:   a)    Lab area, maintenance and dip tank area:  On or about December 1, 2018 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that employees were required to wear a tight fitting half face negative pressure respirator without first being instructed how to clean and store respirators properly.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Abate by
Apr 12, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 072014301860C113

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:    a)  Lab area, maintenance and dip tank area:  On or about December 1, 2018 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that employees were required to wear a tight fitting half face negative pressure respirator without first being provided training as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Abate by
Feb 25, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,031 · Current $1,500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 072014301860C113

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:   a)    Chemical dip tank area:  On or about December 1, 2018 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards by not requiring employees to wear face or eye protection when working inside chemical dip tanks to clean out corrosive chemicals such as but not limited to nitric acid, hydrochloric acid, Dipsol IZ-264 and Dipsol IZ-264T.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3031

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 072014301860C113

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   a)    Facility wide:  On or about October 29, 2018 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that employees were exposed to chemical such as but not limited to the following:  Zi-Ni Chromate, Cobalt, Nitric Acid, and Hydrochloric Acid.  Employees were exposed while conducting regular job tasks and the employer did not ensure a written hazard communication program was implemented at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2019
Abate by
Feb 25, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 072014301860C113

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   a)    Facility wide:  On or about October 29, 2018 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that employees were exposed to chemical such as but not limited to the following:  Zi-Ni Chromate, Cobalt, Nitric Acid, and Hydrochloric Acid.  Employees were exposed while conducting regular job tasks and the employer did not provide training to employees on the hazard communication standard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Georgia Plating Technology, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343573358.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.