YONKERS, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: VICHIHEL RESTORATION, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VICHIHEL RESTORATION, INC. in 61 BRONX RIVER RD., YONKERS, NY 10704 (NAICS 238110). OSHA activity number 343587176.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VICHIHEL RESTORATION, INC.
- Site address
- 61 BRONX RIVER RD.
- City
- YONKERS
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10704
- Mailing
- 86-28 ELIOT AVENUE, REGO PARK, NY 11374
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238110
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,316 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: location: balconies, front of building on or about: 11/7/18 a) Employees, engaged in demolition work of concrete balconies, were not using any means of fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall of up to 55 feet. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3316
- · Z (S) $5174
1926.502 D08
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,316 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(8): Horizontal lifelines were not designed, installed, and used under the supervision of a qualified person, as part of a complete personal fall arrest system, which maintained a safety factor of at least two: location: balconies, front of building on or about: 11/6/18 a) Employees were engaged in demolition work of concrete balconies. The employees were tied off to a horizontal lifeline that was not designed, installed, and used under the supervision of a qualified person, as part of a complete personal fall arrest system, which maintained a safety factor of at least two. The employees were exposed to a fall of up to 75 feet. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3316
- · Z (S) $5174
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person: location: balconies, front of building on or about: 11/6/18 a) Employees were engaged in demolition work of concrete balconies. The employees tied off to frames of a scaffold that was set up near the balconies that the employees were working from. The anchorage was not designed, installed, and used under the supervision of a qualified person, as part of a complete personal fall arrest system, which maintained a safety factor of at least two. The employees were exposed to a fall of up to 75 feet. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $2,368 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: location: throughout site on or about: 11/7/18 a) Employees, exposed to a fall hazard while engaged in concrete demolition work, were not provided with adequate fall protection training. NOTE: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2368
- · Z (S) $3696
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238110)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343587176.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.