Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: US CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of US CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION in 3867 S. TOWNER AVE., NACO, AZ 85620 (NAICS 922130). OSHA activity number 343592606.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch US Customs and Border Protection for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for US Customs and Border Protection is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3867 S. TOWNER AVE.
City
NACO
State
AZ
ZIP
85620
Mailing
3867 S. TOWNER AVE., NACO, AZ 85620
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
922130
Employees
25
Ownership type
Federal government (D)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:  (a) MAT ROOM: The exit route was entirely blocked by padding attached to a door and a sealed metal grate over the exterior ladder exit, exposing employees to hazards from becoming unable to evacuate in the event of an emergency.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.37 B05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet):  (a) BASEMENT: The door at the end of the hallway which could be mistaken for an exit route exit was not clearly marked, exposing employees to hazards from becoming unable to evacuate in the event of an emergency
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  (a) Employees working throughout the facility were exposed to hazards associated with raw sewage spills and the employer had not certified that a workplace hazard assessment had been completed.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.157 C01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries:  (a) ADMIN BUILDING: A portable fire extinguishers was not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible to employees for use in the event of a fire.   NOTE: APPLIES WHEREVER EXTINGUISHERS ARE PROVIDED FOR EMPLOYEE USE INCLUDING EXTINGUISHERS ON THE OUTSIDE OF WORKPLACE BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.157 E02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  (a) ADMIN BUILDING: Portable fire extinguishers required for use in incipient state fires were not visually inspected at least monthly.   Note:  Applies to any extinguishers provided in the workplace.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 18, 2019
Abate by
Jan 25, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:  (a) SHOP AREA-A one gallon ice tea container being used to store chemicals was not correctly labeled to indicate its contents, exposing employee to chemical hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

View US Customs and Border Protection's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343592606.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.