STOUGHTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: F.E. KENNEY COMPANY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of F.E. KENNEY COMPANY, INC. in 470 WASHINGTON STREET, STOUGHTON, MA 02072 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 343593174.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- F.E. KENNEY COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 470 WASHINGTON STREET
- City
- STOUGHTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02072
- Mailing
- 16 UNION STREET, WOBURN, MA 01801
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $853 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Jobsite: Employees working on the roof were exposed to impact head injury hazards from roof eaves and facades but were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $852.5
- — Z (S) $1705
1926.451 H01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold did not wear a hardhat. Location: Fabricated frame scaffold at the front of the building. An employee did not wear a hard hat while on a scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii) Location: Fabricated frame scaffold at front of building A fabricated frame scaffold was not fully planked and exposed an employee to a fall hazard of approximately 13 feet four inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1989
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level. Location: Fabricated frame scaffold at front of building An employee was not adequately protected from a fall of approximately 13 feet 4 inches while working on the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. Jobsite: Employees have not been adequately trained in scaffold safety.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Jobsite: Employees on the roof were inadequately protected against a fall hazards of approximately 17 feet or more.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1989
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. Location: Job site The employer did not have documentation that fall protection training had been provided for employees exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343593174.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.