COLORADO SPRINGS, CO ·
OSHA Inspection: GENERAL MACHINES, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GENERAL MACHINES, INC. in 710 WOOTEN ROAD, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80915 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 343594834.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GENERAL MACHINES, INC.
- Site address
- 710 WOOTEN ROAD
- City
- COLORADO SPRINGS
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80915
- Mailing
- 710 WOOTEN ROAD, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80915
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 7, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $4,434 · Current $2,217 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(A)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a) On or about November 8, 2018 and at times prior, a forklift operator was exposed to serious hazards while operating a TCM forklift at the production and warehouse area. The forklift was missing the seat belt that would assist in reducing the risk of entrapment of the operator's head and/or torso between the truck and ground in the event of a tip over. Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazardous condition would be to follow the requirements for the use of an operator restraint system for powered industrial trucks at ASME B56.1-1993 - Safety Standard for Low Lift and High Lift Trucks.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2217
- · Z (S) $4434
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Dec 7, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,696 · Current $1,848 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): a) On or about November 8, 2018 and at times prior, an employee was exposed to serious hazards at the production area from the point of operation of a CNC machine. The glass door of the CNC machine would not be suffice to prevent the employees from accessing the point of operation. The glass door could easily be opened while the machine was still in operation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1848
- · Z (S) $3696
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Dec 7, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $1,109 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: a) On or about November 8, 2018 and at times prior, employees were exposed to serious hazards while using bench grinders. The adjustable tongue was missing on the bench grinders.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1109
- · Z (S) $2217
1910.37 B04
- Issued
- Dec 7, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $415 · Current $208 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent: a) On or about November 8, 2018 and at times prior, signs pointing to the exit access were not located at the production area. The direction of travel to the exit was not immediate apparent and exposing the employees to entrapment in the event of a fire emergency.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $208
- · Z (O) $415
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- Dec 7, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet): a) On or about November 8, 2018 and at times prior, several doors at the production area that lead outside were locked and not used as exit doors. The doors were not marked with a sign "Not an Exit" and exposing employees to entrapment in the event of a fire emergency.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.37 B06
- Issued
- Dec 7, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color: a) On or about November 8, 2018 and at times prior, an exit sign located at the east side of the shop area was not illuminated. The exit sign would be difficult to see in and exposing the employees to entrapment in the event of a fire emergency.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.37 B07
- Issued
- Dec 7, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(7): Each exit sign did not have the word "Exit" in plainly eligible letters not less than six inches (15.2 cm) high, with the principal strokes of the letters in the word "Exit" not less than three fourths of an inch (1.9 cm) wide: a) On or about November 8, 2018 and at times prior, the word "Exit" on the exit signs were approximately 2 inches in height and the principal strokes of the letters were approximately one fourth of an inch. The exit signs would be difficult to see and exposing the employees to entrapment in the event of a fire emergency.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343594834.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.