Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: RYESON CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RYESON CORPORATION in 555 KIMBERLY DRIVE, CAROL STREAM, IL 60188 (NAICS 333518). OSHA activity number 343594925.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ryeson Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ryeson Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RYESON CORPORATION
Site address
555 KIMBERLY DRIVE
City
CAROL STREAM
State
IL
ZIP
60188
Mailing
555 KIMBERLY DRIVE, CAROL STREAM, IL 60188
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333518
Employees
62
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2019
Abate by
May 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,282 · Current $13,260
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that employees acquired the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage and removal of energy control devices:    On or about October 12, 2018, and thereafter, an employee was performing set-up and die changes on machines such as, but not limited to, the 066 Minster 95-ton punch press. The employee did not have training thus exposing the employee to un-expected start-up from the lack of knowledge and training of the hazards associated with lock out tag out.         Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $13260
  • · Z (S) $9282

1910.147 D

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2019
Abate by
Apr 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,282 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The application of energy control (lockout or tagout) actions were not done in the following sequence:  (1) prepare for shutdown, (2) shut down machine or equipment, (3) physically locate and operate energy isolating devices in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source, (4) affix lockout or tagout devices to each energy isolating device by authorized employee, (5) relieve, disconnect, restrain or otherwise render safe all stored or residual energy, (6) verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment have been accomplished:  On or about November 7, 2018 an employee was performing set-up/changing dies on the Minster 60 and did not lock out the machine. The employee was exposed to amputation hazards from unexpected startup of the machine.  Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $9282

1910.147 F03 II D

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2019
Abate by
Apr 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,282 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment:  On or about October 12, 2018, and thereafter, an employee was performing set-up on machines and did not affix his own lock. The supervisor locked out the machine while the employee performed set-up and die changes exposing the employee  to unexpected start-up.     Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $9282

1910.212 A01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 22, 2019
Abate by
May 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $7,956 · Current $13,260
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    A.  On or about October 12, 2018, and thereafter, the employer did not provide a method of guarding on the Cincinnati mill to prevent employees from having their hands or fingers in the point of operation of the blade and other moving parts.     B. On or about November 9, 2018, and thereafter, the employer did not ensure that the point of operation was guarded for the Leland Gifford drill press to prevent employees from having their hands and fingers in the zone of danger during operation.     C. On or about November 9, 2018, and thereafter, the employer did not provide a method of guarding on the detent machine to prevent employees from having their hands and fingers in the zone of danger during operation.      Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $13260
  • · Z (S) $7956

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343594925.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.