Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: EGC OPERATING COMPANY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of EGC OPERATING COMPANY, LLC in 140 PARKER COURT, CHARDON, OH 44024 (NAICS 339991). OSHA activity number 343595591.

Watch EGC Operating Company, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EGC Operating Company, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
140 PARKER COURT
City
CHARDON
State
OH
ZIP
44024
Mailing
140 PARKER COURT, CHARDON, OH 44024
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339991
Employees
68
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $6467.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    On or about November 13, 2018, the employer failed to develop machine specific procedures for equipment such as, but not limited to, the Ward Jet water cutter, exposing employees to energy sources including, but not limited to, electricity, hydraulics, and pneumatics.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6467
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):    On or about November 13, 2018, employees who conducted service and maintenance activities including, but not limited to, setting up the cutting area and inspecting the cutting nozzle were exposed to machine hazards associated with high pressure water streams. Although the machine machine's pumps were shut down at the computer to perform the servicing work, the remaining applicable energy control elements involving machine isolation [(d)(3)], LOTO device application[(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $3880.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    On or about November 13, 2018, the employer failed to conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually when employees performed lock out/tag out on equipment throughout the facility including, but not limited to, the Ward Jet water cutter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3880
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.147 C07 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $3880.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Each authorized employee had not received training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:    On or about November 13, 2018, employees who conducted servicing and maintenance activities including, but not limited to, setting up the cutting area and inspecting the cutting nozzle were exposed to machine hazards associated with high pressure water streams. The employer failed to provide these authorized employees training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control for equipment such as, but not limited to, the Ward Jet water cutter which employees enter during set up and break down exposing them to energy sources including, but not limited to, electricity, hydraulics, and pneumatics.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3880
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $3880.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about November 13, 2018, employees were exposed to electrical, pneumatic, and hydraulic hazards associated with high pressure water jet streams when they entered the Ward Jet water jet to remove finished parts. The employer failed to provide adequate machine guarding to protect the operator, as employees could reach over and climb over the guard in place to enter the machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3880
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.38 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 68 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.38(b): An emergency action plan was not in writing, kept in the workplace, and available to employees for review:    On or about November 13, 2018, the employer failed to develop a written emergency action plan and keep it in the workplace available to employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 68 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    On or November 13, 2018, the employer failed to certify in writing that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343595591.