BRONX, NY —
OSHA Inspection: PROCIDA CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PROCIDA CONSTRUCTION CORP. in 771-775 CROTONA PARK NORTH, BRONX, NY 10460 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 343601217.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PROCIDA CONSTRUCTION CORP.
- Site address
- 771-775 CROTONA PARK NORTH
- City
- BRONX
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10460
- Mailing
- 456 EAST 173 ST., BRONX, NY 10457
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.201 A
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,298 · Current $2,474 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.201(a): Signaling by flaggers and the use of flaggers, including warning garments worn by flaggers did not conform to Part VI of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, (1988 Edition, Revision 3 or the Millennium Edition): location: intersection of Prospect Ave. and Crotona Park North on or about: 11/14/18 a) An employee, flagging for traffic control, was not wearing high visibility garments conforming to Part VI of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, (1988 Edition, Revision 3 or the Millennium Edition). NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2473.5
- — Z (S) $3298
1926.752 A01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.752(a)(1): Before authorizing the commencement of steel erection, the controlling contractor did not ensure that the steel erector was provided with the following written notifications; the concrete in the footings, piers and walls and the mortar in the masonry piers and walls has attained, on the basis of an appropriate ASTM standard test method of field-cured samples, either 75 percent of the intended minimum compressive design strength or sufficient strength to support the loads imposed during steel erection: location: entire site on or about: 11/14/18 a) The employer did not provide the steel erector with written notification that the concrete in the footings, piers and walls and the mortar in the masonry piers and walls has attained, on the basis of an appropriate ASTM standard test method of field-cured samples, either 75 percent of the intended minimum compressive design strength or sufficient strength to support the loads imposed during steel erection. NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Procida Construction Corp.
View Procida Construction Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343601217.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.