Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JEMCO ERECTORS, INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of JEMCO ERECTORS, INC. in 771-775 CROTONA PARK NORTH, BRONX, NY 10460 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 343601399.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jemco Erectors, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jemco Erectors, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
771-775 CROTONA PARK NORTH
City
BRONX
State
NY
ZIP
10460
Mailing
142 STOKES RD., SHAMONG, NJ 08088
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238120
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 1 10 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,968 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.701(b): Reinforcing steel. All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and into which employees could fall, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement:    Location: 2nd floor terrace  on or about: 11/14/18    a) Employees were working beside approximately 10 unguarded rebar.       NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $1300
  • — C (S) $2968
  • — Z (S) $2968

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,968 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    location: exterior of building, ladder leaned up against 2nd floor terrace  on or about: 11/14/18    a) Employees were using an extension ladder to gain access to and from the 2nd floor terrace. The ladder extended less than 2 feet above the terrace.      NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $1300
  • — C (S) $2968
  • — Z (S) $2968

1926.752 B

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Nov 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.752(b): Commencement of steel erection. A steel erection contractor erected steel before it had received written notification that the concrete in the footings, piers and walls or the mortar in the masonry piers and walls has attained, on the basis of an appropriate ASTM standard test method of field-cured samples, either 75 percent of the intended minimum compressive design strength or sufficient strength to support the loads imposed during steel erection:  location: entire site on or about: 11/14/18  a) Employees were engaged in steel erection activities. The steel erector was not provided with the written notification that the concrete in the footings, piers and walls and the mortar in the masonry piers and walls has attained, on the basis of an appropriate ASTM standard test method of field-cured samples, either 75 percent of the intended minimum compressive design strength or sufficient strength to support the loads imposed during steel erection.   NOTE: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the inspection casefile, the employer need not submit certification or documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Jemco Erectors, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343601399.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.