Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: MARATHON CHEESE CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MARATHON CHEESE CORPORATION in 304 EAST ST., MARATHON, WI 54448 (NAICS 311513). OSHA activity number 343608394.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Marathon Cheese Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Marathon Cheese Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
304 EAST ST.
City
MARATHON
State
WI
ZIP
54448
Mailing
P.O. BOX 185, MARATHON, WI 54448
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311513
Employees
1200
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C07 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Abate by
May 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,934 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A):  Each authorized employee shall receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control:  A Group Leader employee on Line 14 did not receiving training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in their equipment, and the method and means necessary for energy isolation and control when unjamming the Accumulator on Line 14.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $11934

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $5,967
29 CFR 1910.147(d): Application of control. The established procedures for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) shall cover the following elements and actions and shall be done in the following sequence:    Employees were exposed to machine caught-between hazards associated with moving parts when they engaged in servicing and maintenance activities on the:    a)  Line 14 Accumulator    b)  Line 27 Combi    c)  Line 38 Bossar's duckbills    The employer did not ensure that energy control application steps to control the electrical and pneumatic energy sources were implemented prior to allowing employees to unjam products on the aforementioned equipment. The machines were not shut down or turned off prior to engaging in this servicing and maintenance activity.    As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving machine isolation [1910.147(d)(3)], lockout/tagout device application [1910.147(d)(4)], dissipation of residual energy [1910.147(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [1910.147(d)(6)] were not implemented to protect employees from machine servicing hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $5967
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.176 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Abate by
May 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,934 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.176(a):  Where mechanical handling equipment is used, sufficient safe clearances shall be allowed for aisles, at loading docks, through doorways and wherever turns or passage must be made. Aisles and passageways shall be kept clear and in good repair, with no obstruction across or in aisles that could create a hazard. Permanent aisles and passageways shall be appropriately marked:  In the Receiving area where forklifts and pedestrians worked, sufficient safe clearances were not allowed for aisles wherever turns and passage must be made. Permanent aisles and passageways were not appropriately marked. A cinderblock structure along the west wall of the Receiving area blocked the path between the marked walkway and a workstation adjacent to an area where forklifts placed pallets of product.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $11934

1910.178 N06

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Abate by
May 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(n)(6):  The driver shall be required to look in the direction of, and keep a clear view of the path of travel:  In the Receiving area where forklifts and pedestrians worked, a Warehouse Forklift operator did not keep a clear view of the path of travel when driving in reverse. The front left tire of the forklift drove over a Warehouse pedestrian's foot.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $11,934 · Current $5,967 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):  One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.:    One or more methods of machine guarding were not provided to protect Operators of Line 25, Line 38 and Material Handler employees from the ingoing nip points of AccuRate powder augers.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $5967
  • · Z (S) $11934

1910.147 C04 II D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2019
Abate by
May 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $957 · Current $957
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D):  Energy control procedures shall clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures:  The energy control procedure for the Combi Box equipment did not include specific requirements for testing the machine to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $957
  • · Z (O) $957

View Marathon Cheese Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343608394.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.