OSHA Inspection: SCHODACK AUTO, INC.

Issued

2019-01-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-04-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3031.00 · Current $1819.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters was not protected with approved automatic sprinklers:     (a) On and before 11/20/2018, at spray area, for the spray booth being used by painter and painter assistant to spray paint vehicles containing flammable chemicals such as, but not limited to, n-butanol.  The booth was not equipped with automatic sprinklers.

Issued

2019-01-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-03-01 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3031.00 · Current $1819.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:        (a) On and before 11/20/2018, in the paint area, for the painter and painter assistant working with/around flammable hazardous chemicals and wearing a 3M half-face respirator while spraypainting vehicles and a 3M N95 respirator sanding vehicles.  The employees were not provided a medical evaluation prior to being required to wear the respirator.

Issued

2019-01-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-02-11 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3789.00 · Current $2273.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    (a) On and before 11/20/2018, in the mechanical detail shop, for the detailers working with/around corrosive TEC258 Brake-R Non-Acid Tire & Wheel Cleaner containing sodium hydroxide.  The employer did not provide an eyewash and facilities for quick drenching of the body.

Issued

2019-01-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-03-01 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3789.00 · Current $2273.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:        (a) On and before 11/20/2018, in the mechanical detail shop, for the detailers working with/around corrosive TEC258 Brake-R Non-Acid Tire & Wheel Cleaner containing sodium hydroxide.  Employer did not develop a hazard communication program.

Issued

2019-01-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-03-01 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) On and before 11/20/2018, in the mechanical detail shop, for the detailers working with/around corrosive TEC258 Brake-R Non-Acid Tire & Wheel Cleaner containing sodium hydroxide.  Training was not provided to employees regarding chemical hazards.

Issued

2019-01-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-03-01 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  The employer did not ensure that employees using tight fitting face piece respirators pass an appropriate qualitative or quantitative fit test prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.   (a) On and before 11/20/2018, in the paint area, for the painter and painter assistant working with/around flammable hazardous chemicals and wearing a 3M half-face respirator while spraypainting vehicles and a 3M N95 respirator sanding vehicles.  The employees were not fit tested, either qualitatively or quantitatively, prior to being required to use this respirator by the employer.