GRAND PRAIRIE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: FASTENER SPECIALTY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FASTENER SPECIALTY, INC. in 2435 109TH STREET, GRAND PRAIRIE, TX 75050 (NAICS 335999). OSHA activity number 343618138.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FASTENER SPECIALTY, INC.
- Site address
- 2435 109TH STREET
- City
- GRAND PRAIRIE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75050
- Mailing
- 2435 109TH ST, GRAND PRAIRIE, TX 75050
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 335999
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,031 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading Exit. : In the spray area of the facility, the employer did not mark the exit door with a clearly visible and illuminated sign exposing employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3031
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,031 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted when employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 dBA: In the production area of the facility, employees were exposed to continuous noise level at 105.6% of the allowable 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (85 dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 105.6% is approximately 90.4 dBA. The sampling was performed for 345 minutes during one shift on November 29, 2018. Zero exposure was assumed for the 135 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $3031
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910. 151(c): Where the eyes and body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body was not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: In the spray area of the facility, employees using corrosive chemicals were not provided with an eye wash station within the spray area for immediate flushing of the eyes in an emergency exposing employees to eye and skin injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $3789
1910.303 E01 II
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910. 303(e)(1)(ii): Markings were not provided for voltage, current, wattage, and other ratings as necessary: In the spray area of the facility, the employer had electrical panel boxes that energized equipment for production that did not have marked voltage ratings.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $3789
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910. 1200(e)(1): Employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at each work place, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning: In the production facility, the employer did not ensure that a written hazard communication program with all the required elements was available at the workplace for employees using chemicals such as MEK and Acetone.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $3789
More inspections at Fastener Specialty, INC.
View Fastener Specialty, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 335999)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343618138.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.