Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: VIRGINIA BRUKETTA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of VIRGINIA BRUKETTA in 19644 E CR 1500N, HAVANA, IL 62644 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343629499.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Virginia Bruketta for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Virginia Bruketta is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VIRGINIA BRUKETTA
Site address
19644 E CR 1500N
City
HAVANA
State
IL
ZIP
62644
Mailing
181 E DIVISION ST. PO BOX 34, NORRIS, IL 61553
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2019
Abate by
Jun 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On March 04, 2019, Virginia Bruketta dba Bruketta Construction was issued citations and the employer did not certify that the citations were abated.  Abatement certification was not received for the following items:  a.    Citation 1, Item 1a, b.    Citation 1, Item 1b, c.    Citation 1, Item 2a, d.    Citation 1, Item 2b.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $319

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2019
Abate by
Jun 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  On March 04, 2019, Virginia Bruketta dba Bruketta Construction was issued citations and the employer did not document that the citations were abated.  Abatement documentation was not received for the following items:  a.    Citation 1, Item 3a, b.    Citation 1, Item 3b, c.    Citation 1, Item 3c, d.    Citation 1, Item 4a, e.    Citation 1, Item 4b.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $319

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:   On or about November 28, 2018, employees were exposed to eye injuries while operating pneumatic nailers and the employer did not have a Safety and Health Program to address areas such as, but not limited to, eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2842

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  On or about November 28, 2018, employees were exposed to eye injuries while operating pneumatic nailers and the employer did not ensure frequent and regular inspections of the site were performed by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury:  On or about November 28, 2018, employees were exposed to eye injuries while operating pneumatic nailers and each employee had not been trained on the procedures to be followed in order to minimize or eliminate these hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2842

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  On or about November 28, 2018, employees were exposed to eye injuries while operating pneumatic nailers and the employer did not ensure the use of proper eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): The employer did not ensure employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   On or about November 28, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards up to 24 feet above a lower level while performing roofing activities and a suitable fall protection system was not used.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about November 28, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards up to 24 feet above a lower level while performing roofing activities and each employee was not trained on the procedures to be followed to minimize the fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  On or about November 28, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards up to 24 feet while performing roofing activities and the employer had not prepared a written certification record.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): The employer did not ensure portable ladders used for access to an upper landing surface had ladder side rails which extended at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:  On or about November 28, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 10 feet while accessing and exiting the roof via an extension ladder which did not extend 3 feet above the roof being accessed.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3978

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 4, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, enabling each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:  On or about November 28, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 10 feet while accessing and exiting a roof via an extension ladder and the employer did not provide construction safety training in hazard recognition related to ladders.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343629499.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.