Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: ANGELINA STEEL, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ANGELINA STEEL, INC. in 1310 N. JOHN REDDITT DRIVE, LUFKIN, TX 75904 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 343629622.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Angelina Steel, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Angelina Steel, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1310 N. JOHN REDDITT DRIVE
City
LUFKIN
State
TX
ZIP
75904
Mailing
1310 N. JOHN REDDITT DRIVE, LUFKIN, TX 75904
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2018
Abate by
Jan 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,330 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Except as provided elsewhere in this section, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following: guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall protection system, such as a personal fall arrest, travel restraint, or positioning system:     On or about November 27, 2018, and at times prior thereto at the facility where employees were exposed to a fall hazard exceeding four feet when working to assemble a pollution scrubber without a fall protection system in place.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1330.2
  • · Z (S) $2217

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2018
Abate by
Feb 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    On or about November 27, 2018, and at times prior thereto, throughout the facility where employees were exposed to caught-in, struck-by, and electrical hazards while performing maintenance and servicing work on machines and equipment without having an energy control program that included energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1663.2
  • · Z (S) $2772

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 7 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2018
Abate by
Feb 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,663 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    On or about November 27, 2018, and at times prior thereto:       a. In the fabrication area where employees were exposed to caught-by hazards while using a Binko brand roll bender without a guard to protect employees from the machine's point of operation.          b. In the fabrication area where employees were exposed to caught-by hazards while using a Montgomery brand roll bender without a guard to protect employees from the machine's point of operation.      c. In the fabrication area where employees were exposed to caught-by hazards while using a Lown brand roll bender without a guard to protect employees from the machine's point of operation.      d. In the fabrication area where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards while using a 50 ton Piranha brand iron worker without a guard to protect employees from the machine's punch and shear points of operations.      e. In the fabrication area where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards while using a 70 ton Piranha brand iron worker without a guard to protect employees from the machine's shear point of operation.      f. In the fabrication area where employees were exposed to stuck-by and caught-by hazards while using a Jet brand drill press without a guard to protect employees from the machine's point of operation.      g. In the fabrication area where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while using a Summit brand press break without a guard to protect employees from the machine's point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1663.2
  • · Z (S) $2772

1910.305 G02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2018
Abate by
Jan 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,326 · Current $1,996 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap:    On or about November 27, 2018, and at times prior thereto, in the fabrication area where employees were exposed to an electrical hazard while working near a spliced extension cord used to power a welding stick warming light without ensuring the splice retained the insulation, outer sheath properties, or usage characteristics of the cord.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1995.6
  • · Z (S) $3326

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2018
Abate by
Feb 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:    On or about November 27, 2018, and at times prior thereto, when employees working throughout the facility were fabricating metal products before a hazard assessment of the workplace had been verified through a written certification for appropriate personal protective equipment needed to protect against present or likely hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.132 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2018
Abate by
Feb 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(h)(1): Except as provided by paragraphs (h)(2) through (h)(6) of this section, the protective equipment, including personal protective equipment (PPE), used to comply with this part, was not provided by the employer at no cost to employees:    On or about November 27, 2018, and at times prior thereto, when employees working throughout the facility fabricating metal products were required to wear gloves while performing various tasks without the protective equipment being provided by the employer at no cost to the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2018
Abate by
Feb 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace:       On or about November 27, 2018, and at times prior thereto, when employees in the facility were required to operate forklifts while moving material without having been trained and evaluated to ensure they could do so safely.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2018
Abate by
Jan 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  On or about November 27, 2018, and at times prior thereto, in the fabrication area where employees were working near an extension cord used to power a welding stick warming light without ensuring that the plug fitting was connected so that strain relief was provided to prevent pull from being applied to terminal screws.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343629622.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.