MERRIMACK, NH ·
OSHA Inspection: MARIA ALBERS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARIA ALBERS in 5 GILBERT DRIVE, MERRIMACK, NH 03054 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343662185.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARIA ALBERS
- Site address
- 5 GILBERT DRIVE
- City
- MERRIMACK
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03054
- Mailing
- 452 CENTRAL STREET, LOWELL, MA 01852
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent March 27, 2019.
Recent events (3)
- · F (O) $0
- · C (O) $319
- · Z (O) $319
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest system. Location: roof On or about 12/11/18, employees were not protected from falling while working on a roof more than 6 feet above a lower level.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $2000
- · C (S) $3978
- · Z (S) $3978
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds per employee attached. Location: roof On or about 12/11/18, anchors used as part of personal fall arrest systems were not installed as per manufacturers' instructions to ensure the anchor point will support the required load.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $3978
- · Z (S) $3978
1926.503 A02 III
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used. Location: Roof On or about 12/11/18, the employer did not ensure employees using personal fall arrest systems were properly trained including but not limited to: using roof anchors, proper snap hooks and harness use.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $3978
- · Z (S) $3978
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343662185.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.