Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ in 606 RICH AVE., GULFPORT, MS 39501 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 343663779.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Miguel Rodriguez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Miguel Rodriguez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ
Site address
606 RICH AVE.
City
GULFPORT
State
MS
ZIP
39501
Mailing
14 EAST PASS RD. LOT14, GULFPORT, MS 39507
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2)(ii): When walkways between scaffold sections are less than 18 inches wide, employees were not protected from falls by guardrail systems or personal fall arrest systems:  (a) Around the exterior of house - On or about December 13, 2018 employees were exposed to a fall hazard.  The employees framing a new house were working from a wooden scaffolding the had the walkway planks 5 1/2 inches wide with no guard rails or fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.451 B03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3): The front edge of all platforms was not 14 inches (36 cm) or less from the face of the work, and no guardrail systems were erected along the front edge and/or no personal fall arrest systems were used in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section to protect employees from falling.Note:  See exceptions in paragraphs (b)(3)(i) and (ii) of this section.  (a) Around exterior of house walls - On or about December 13, 2018 employees were exposed to a fall hazard.  The employees were walking on the scaffold walkway plank framing a new house that was 23 inches away from the house wall without any guard rails or fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1705

1926.451 B06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,410 · Current $3,410
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(6): On scaffolds where scaffold planks were abutted to create a long platform, each abutted end did not rest on a separate support surface:  (a) Front of house wall - On or about December 13, 2018 employees were exposed to a fall hazard.  The employees framing a new single story house were working from a job made wooden scaffolding that has the walkway plank spliced and is not resting on a supported surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3410

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,410 · Current $3,410
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  (a) Exterior of house walls - On or about December 13, 2018 employees were exposed to a fall hazard.  The employees framing a new single story house were using a wooden scaffolding that had no mud sill plates under the supports and the scaffolding was sinking into the ground.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3410

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a)  NOTE TO CSHO: USE THIS OPTION ONLY IN CASES WHERE THE INFEASIBILITY/GREATER HAZARD EXCEPTION IS NOT IN ISSUE.  (a) Top of roof - On or about December 13, 2018 employees were exposed to a fall hazard. The employees applying roof plywood sheeting on steep roof 9 feet 6 inches high were not protected from falls with the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.100 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  (a) South side of house - On or about December 13, 2018 employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard.  The employees were applying plywood sheeting on the roof of a new framed house while an employee on the ground was cutting and handing plywood up to the guys, was not protected from head impact with a hard hat.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.454 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  (a) Around exterior of house - On or about December 13, 2018 employees were exposed to a fall hazard.  The employees framing a new single family dwelling were working from wooden scaffolding and never received training on how to recognize, control or minimize the hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.454 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Feb 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.  (a) Around the exterior of the house walls - On or about December 13, 2018 employees were exposed to a fall hazard.  The employees framing a new single family house assembled a wooden scaffolding without being trained on how to recognize any hazards associated with it.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Miguel Rodriguez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343663779.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.