Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: KEVIN VENDEN

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KEVIN VENDEN in 1811 8TH STREET, MONROE, WI 53566 (NAICS 562910). OSHA activity number 343668380.

Watch Kevin Venden — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kevin Venden is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KEVIN VENDEN
Site address
1811 8TH STREET
City
MONROE
State
WI
ZIP
53566
Mailing
1002 13TH STREET, BRODHEAD, WI 53520
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562910
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   The employer failed to submit certification of abatement within 10 calendar days of the abatement date for Citation 1 Items 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a and 2b.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1705.00 · Current $1705.00

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:   From the period between October 23, 2018 and December 18, 2018 the company did not develop a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear an elastomeric respirator (half mask) while scraping lead based paint.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1705

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  From the period between October 23, 2018 and December 18, 2018 employees were required to wear an elastomeric respirator while scraping lead based paint and employees were not provided a medical evaluation prior to wearing an elastomeric respirator.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) was used:   From the period between October 23, 2018 and December 18, 2018 employees were required to wear an elastomeric respirator while scraping lead based paint and employees were not fit tested prior to wearing an elastomeric respirator.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.62 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2273.00 · Current $2273.00

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30 ug/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA):  From the period between October 23, 2018 and December 18, 2018 employee scraped lead based paint and employees lead exposure was not evaluated.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.62 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment, as required in 29 CFR 1926.62(d), and documented that the employee(s) performing any of the listed tasks was not exposed above the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL), the employer did not treat affected employee(s) as if they were exposed above the PEL, and not in excess of ten times the PEL, and did not implement employee protective measures prescribed in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v):  From the period between October 23, 2018 and December 18, 2018 employee scraped lead based paint and employees lead exposure was not evaluated and did not provide employees with change areas, hand washing facilities and biological monitoring.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343668380.