GEORGETOWN, MA —
OSHA Inspection: COX ENGINEERING
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of COX ENGINEERING in 4 CARLETON DRIVE, GEORGETOWN, MA 01833 (NAICS 333415). OSHA activity number 343671756.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COX ENGINEERING
- Site address
- 4 CARLETON DRIVE
- City
- GEORGETOWN
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01833
- Mailing
- 4 CARLETON DRIVE, GEORGETOWN, MA 01833
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 333415
- Employees
- 62
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A05
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2019
- Abate by
- May 14, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $9,472 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(5): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used equipment with filter lenses that had a shade number appropriate for the work being performed for protection from injurious light radiation 4 Carleton Drive, Georgetown, MA 01833 a) On or about December 19, 2018, an employee operating a plasma cutting machine did not have eye protection that protected from injurious light radiation.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $9472
- — Z (S) $9472
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $5,683 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: 4 Carleton Drive, Georgetown, MA a) On or about December 19, 2018, elements of a written respiratory protection program were not established with work-site specific procedures for the use of a tight-fitting half face respirator. Employee was permitted to voluntarily wear a tight-fitting respirator while conducting plasma cutting.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $1000
- — C (S) $5683
- — Z (S) $5683
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: 4 Carleton Drive, Georgetown, MA On or about December 19, 2018, medical evaluations were not completed for employees that utilized a tight-fitting half face respirator. An employee that was permitted to voluntarily wear a the tight-fitting half-face respirator while completing daily job tasks such as plasma cutting aluminum sheet metal was not provided a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to wear the respirator.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I B
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,472 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure: 4 Carleton Drive, Georgetown, MA a) On or about October 24, 2018, an employee operating an Actira shear was not instructed on the purpose and use of the energy control procedure. The employee worked on a shear that could be locked out.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $1000
- — C (S) $9472
- — Z (S) $9472
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $13,260 · Current $8,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): 4 Carleton Drive, Georgetown Ma. Main shop floor. Employees were exposed to point of operation hazards that were not guarded to prevent employees from entering the danger zone, including but not limited to the following instances; a) On or about October 24, 2018, an employee operating a metal shear machine in the main shop was exposed to a point of operation hazard due to having their hands in the danger zone during the operating cycle. Sections of the guards were easily moved up, and an employee suffered an amputation of two fingertips.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $8000
- — C (S) $13260
- — Z (S) $13260
1910.252 B02 III
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $13,260 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields. 4 Carelton Drive, Georgetown, MA. Main shop floor. a) On or about December 19, 2018, an employee was welding a metal component in the open warehouse area without positioning a noncombustible or flameproof screen or shield to protect adjacent persons from the rays. b) On or about December 19, 2018, plasma cutting being conducted on a plasma cutting machine was not shielded by a noncombustible or flameproof screen or shield to protect employees in the area of the machine.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $2500
- — C (S) $13260
- — Z (S) $13260
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $9,472 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report within 24-hours a work-related incident resulting in in-patient hospitalization, amputation or the loss of an eye. Location: Conference room. On or about October 24, 2018, a temporary worker operating a metal shear machine in the main shop suffered an amputation injury to his right ring and middle fingers and the injury was not reported to OSHA within 24 hours.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $1000
- — C (O) $9472
- — Z (O) $9472
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Apr 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent) was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation. 4 Carleton Drive, Georgetown, MA 01833 On or about December 19, 2018, OSHA 300 logs was not completed in detail as required by the regulation. The OSHA 300 logs did contain specific information for recordable injuries.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at COX Engineering
View COX Engineering's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 333415)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343671756.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.