NAPERVILLE, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: OROCHEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of OROCHEM TECHNOLOGIES INC. in 340 SHUMAN BLVD, NAPERVILLE, IL 60563 (NAICS 334516). OSHA activity number 343675625.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OROCHEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Site address
- 340 SHUMAN BLVD
- City
- NAPERVILLE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60563
- Mailing
- 340 SHUMAN BLVD, NAPERVILLE, IL 60563
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 334516
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 E06 I
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $9,282 · Current $6,250 Reduced
2460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(i): Adequate precautions were not taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors from sources such as open flames; lightning; smoking; cutting and welding; hot surfaces; frictional heat; static, electrical, and mechanical sparks; spontaneous ignition, including heat-producing chemical reactions; and radiant heat: On or about December 14, 2018, an employee was exposed to fire hazards that resulted in second degree burns to the hand, back, and other body parts. The employee was performing a washing process that required transferring toluene from an unbonded and ungrounded 55 gallon drum via a hand pump. The employer did not ensure adequate precautions were taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors from sources such as, but not limited to, static electricity. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $6250
- · Z (S) $9282
1910.106 E06 II
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
2460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(ii): Category 1 or 2 flammable liquids, or Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 degree F (37.8 degree C), were dispensed into containers without the containers being electrically interconnected: On or about December 14, 2018, an employee was exposed to fire hazards that resulted in second degree burns to the hand, back, and other body parts. The employee was performing a washing process that required transferring toluene from an unbonded and ungrounded 55 gallon drum via a hand pump. The employer did not ensure that adequate precautions were taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors from sources such as, but not limited to, static electricity. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $9,282 · Current $6,250 Reduced
2460
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered. On or about December 14, 2018, an employee was exposed to fire hazards that resulted in second degree burns to the back and other body parts. The employee was performing a washing process that required transferring toluene from an unbonded and ungrounded 55 gallon drum via a hand pump. The employer did not require use of personal protective equipment to protect against burns to the back and other parts of the body. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $6250
- · Z (S) $9282
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $9,282 · Current $6,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment. On or about December 14, 2018, an employee was exposed to fire hazards that resulted in second degree burns to the back and other body parts. The employee was performing a washing process that required transferring toluene from an unbonded and ungrounded 55 gallon drum via a hand pump. The employer did not ensure that an adequate assessment was conducted to determine if hazards were present which required the use of personal protective equipment against burns to the hand, back and other parts of the body. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $6250
- · Z (S) $9282
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $9,282 · Current $6,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): General requirements. Employers shall select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands are exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes. On or about December 14, 2018, an employee was exposed to fire hazards that resulted in second degree burns to the back and other body parts. The employee was performing a washing process that required transferring toluene from an unbonded and ungrounded 55 gallon drum via a hand pump. The employer did not require the use of hand protection to protect against burns to the hands. There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $6250
- · Z (S) $9282
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 334516)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343675625.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.