NEW LONDON, NH ·
OSHA Inspection: PAGUAY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL SVS INC.
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of PAGUAY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL SVS INC. in PEARL ST. & MAIN ST., NEW LONDON, NH 03257 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343685970.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PAGUAY CONSTRUCTION GENERAL SVS INC.
- Site address
- PEARL ST. & MAIN ST.
- City
- NEW LONDON
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03257
- Mailing
- 141 CENTRAL ST., MILFORD, MA 01757
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Apr 8, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: a. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent March 27, 2019. b. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent March 27, 2019. c. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3, nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent March 27, 2019.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $319
1926.451 G01 III
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(iii): Each employee on a crawling board (chicken ladder) was not protected by a personal fall arrest system, a guardrail system (with minimum 200 pound toprail capacity), or by a three-fourth inch (1.9 cm) diameter grabline or equivalent handhold securely fastened beside each crawling board: a. Site - An Employee who was using a "Chicken Ladder" to travel between the eave and the peak of the roof in order to transport bundles of shingles without the use of either fall protection or a grab line.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $3978
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. Site - Employees performing roofing work were not protected from falls of approximately 32 feet when fall protection equipment was not being used.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $3978
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 23, 2019
- Abate by
- Jan 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a. Site - Employees using a 40 foot aluminum extension ladder to gain access to and from the roof were not protected from falls of approximately 32 feet when the side rails of the ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the roof line.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2842
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343685970.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.