Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TAYLOR OIL NORTHEAST, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TAYLOR OIL NORTHEAST, INC. in 176 CENTRE STREET, HOLBROOK, MA 02343 (NAICS 424720). OSHA activity number 343690780.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Taylor OIL Northeast, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Taylor OIL Northeast, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
176 CENTRE STREET
City
HOLBROOK
State
MA
ZIP
02343
Mailing
176 CENTRE STREET, HOLBROOK, MA 02343
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424720
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Jan 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(i): Adequate precautions were not taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors:  Sources of ignition include but are not limited to: open flames; lightning; smoking; cutting and welding; hot surfaces; frictional heat; static, electrical, and mechanical sparks; spontaneous ignition, including heat-producing chemical reactions; and radiant heat.     Location: Warehouse    Employees were exposed to fire hazards because they were smoking in the warehouse, where flammable liquids were stored and dispensed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.106 E02 IV D

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 28 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Mar 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,109 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(d): Flammable liquids were not drawn from or transferred into vessels, containers, or portable tanks within a building through a closed piping system, from safety cans, by means of a device drawing through the top, or from a container or portable tanks by gravity through an approved self-closing valve:    Location: Warehouse      Employees were exposed to fires while dispensing flammable liquids from 150 gallon totes by gravity through valves that had to be closed manually and had not been approved.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1108.5
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Mar 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,478 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment    Because the employer did not perform an assessment of the workplace to determine if personal protective equipment was necessary, employees were not fully protected from the hazards of flammable and toxic chemicals, including, but not limited to, diesel fuel.  fuel additives, and oils and lubricants.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1478
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Mar 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation    Employees were exposed to flying particles and chemicals that were hazardous to the eyes, and the employer did not ensure the use of eye protection during handling and usage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Mar 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,478 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    Employees were exposed to struck by and crushing hazards because the employer did not ensure that each forklift truck operator had been trained and evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1478
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Jan 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,478 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s)      Employees were exposed to struck by and crushing hazards because the employer did not ensure that the HALLA HLF 30 forklift was taken out of service when the horn was inoperable, and the brakes were defective.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1478
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Mar 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined for conditions that could adversely affect the safety of the vehicle on a daily basis before being placed in service.  Employees were exposed to struck by and crushing hazards because the employer did not ensure that forklikft operators inspect the HALLA HLF 30 forklift at least daily for conditions that could affect the safety of the vehicle.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Mar 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,478 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:,     Location: Facility   A  written hazard communication program had not been developed and implemented where employees were exposed to flammable chemicals with health hazards, including, but not limited to, diesel fuel, diesel exhaust fluid, diesel fuel additives, hydraulic, motor, grease, and gear oils, and lubricants.    ABATEMENT NOTE:  A written program shall include description of how the criteria for the following will be met:        1.  Labeling and other forms of warning;      2.  Material Safety Data Sheets;      3.  Employee information and training    Additionally, methods used to inform employees of the hazards associated with non-routine tasks and the informing of contractors of workplace hazards, including a description of the labeling system used in the facility and of the availability of material safety data sheets, must also be addressed.  The written program must be made available upon request.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1478
  • — Z (S) $2956

View Taylor OIL Northeast, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343690780.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.