BOSTON, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: MAINSAIL MANAGEMENT, INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of MAINSAIL MANAGEMENT, INC. in 35 CONCORD SQUARE, BOSTON, MA 02118 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 343700407.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAINSAIL MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Site address
- 35 CONCORD SQUARE
- City
- BOSTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02118
- Mailing
- 251 NEWBURY STREET, BOSTON, MA 02116
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 A02
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,387 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(a)(2): The employer did not determine if the walking/working surfaces on which its employees were to work on, had the strength and structure integrity to support employees safely: Jobsite: Roof The employer did not determine whether the roof was strong enough to support employees and a subcontractor employee fell through the roof and was seriously injured.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $2387
- · C (S) $3978
- · Z (S) $3978
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. Jobsite: The employer allowed subcontractor employees onto the roof to retrieve materials and equipment without their being protected against falls.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.850 A
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.850(a): Evidence in writing was not available that an engineering survey performed by a competent person had been performed prior to permitting employee(s) to start demolition operations: Jobsite: An engineering survey had not been performed by a competent person to determine whether the removal of roof joists could result in the unplanned collapse of the roof.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $0
- · C (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343700407.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.