Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: MAINSAIL MANAGEMENT, INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of MAINSAIL MANAGEMENT, INC. in 35 CONCORD SQUARE, BOSTON, MA 02118 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 343700407.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mainsail Management, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mainsail Management, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
35 CONCORD SQUARE
City
BOSTON
State
MA
ZIP
02118
Mailing
251 NEWBURY STREET, BOSTON, MA 02116
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
1
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,387 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(a)(2): The employer did not determine if the walking/working surfaces on which its employees were to work on, had the strength and structure integrity to support employees safely:    Jobsite:  Roof    The employer did not determine whether the roof was strong enough to support employees and a subcontractor employee fell through the roof and was seriously injured.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2387
  • · C (S) $3978
  • · Z (S) $3978

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system.  Jobsite:  The employer allowed subcontractor employees onto the roof to retrieve materials and equipment without their being protected against falls.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.850 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2019
Abate by
Apr 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.850(a): Evidence in writing was not available that an engineering survey performed by a competent person had been performed prior to permitting employee(s) to start demolition operations:  Jobsite:  An engineering survey had not been performed by a competent person to determine whether the removal of roof joists could result in the unplanned collapse of the roof.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343700407.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.