MINDEN, NE —
OSHA Inspection: WARDCRAFT HOMES, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of WARDCRAFT HOMES, INC. in 1230 E 9TH ST, MINDEN, NE 68959 (NAICS 321992). OSHA activity number 343706503.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WARDCRAFT HOMES, INC.
- Site address
- 1230 E 9TH ST
- City
- MINDEN
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68959
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 55, CLAY CENTER, KS 67432
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321992
- Employees
- 60
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C08
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $11,934 · Current $5,967 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(8): 29 CFR 1910.23(c)(8) The employer did not ensure that the top cap and the top step of a step ladder were not used as steps. The employer is failing to ensure that employees are not exposed to a fall hazard when using top step of the "A" frame ladder to access and egress the working surface. This was most recently documented on January 8, 2019 at 1230 East 9th Street Minden, Nebraska. The employer has employees exposed to fall hazards while using a 4 foot A frame ladder as means of access and egress to a working surface that is 35 inches above the floor. Instances of exposure include but are not limited to: i. Employees using the top step of the ladder without having a hand grip a minimum of 3 feet over the upper landing surface. ii. Employees having to step up 23 inches without using the top step or "cap" to access a work level 35 inches above the floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5967
- — Z (S) $11934
1910.25 B07
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.25(b)(7): Standard stairs were not used to provide access from one walking-working surface to another when operations necessitate regular and routine travel between levels. The employer is failing to ensure that employees are not exposed to a fall hazard when using an "A" frame step ladder to access and egress the working surface. This was most recently documented on January 8, 2019 at 1230 East 9th Street Minden, Nebraska. The employer has employees using a 4 foot A frame ladder in lieu of standard stairs as means of access and egress to the working surface 35 inches above the floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,115 · Current $2,558 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: The employer is failing to ensure that employees are protected from hazards associated with the utilizing of respirators when working with hazardous chemicals. This was most recently documented on January 8, 2019 at 1230 East 9th Street Minden, Nebraska. The employer failed to develop and implement a written respiratory protection program that would ensure the safety of the employees required to utilize respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2557.5
- — Z (S) $5115
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards: The employer failed to protect employees from respiratory hazards that could cause chronic or acute health conditions. This was most recently documented on January 8, 2019 at 1230 E 9th St. Minden, Nebraska. The employer failed to evaluate the following but not limited to chemicals being used in the work place: DOW Great Stuff(TM) window and door insulation containing various forms of Isocyanates and Johns Manville Fiberglass blowing Wool containing particulates not otherwise defined (Total Dust).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: The employer is failing to ensure that employees were medically evaluated prior to requiring the utilization of respirators. This was most recently documented on January 8, 2019 at 1230 East 9th Street Minden, Nebraska. The employer failed to provide a medical evaluation prior to requiring the use of a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): The employer is failing to ensure that employees are fit tested to ensure a tight-fit of the respirator was attained. This was most recently documented on January 8, 2019 at 1230 East 9th Street Minden, Nebraska. The employer failed to ensure that employees passed a QLFT or QNFT prior to wearing a tight-fitting facepiece respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $8,525 · Current $4,263 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. The employer failed to ensure that employees were not exposed to struck-by hazards. This was most recently documented on January 8, 2019 at 1230 East 9th Street Minden, Nebraska. The employer failed to ensure that each employee has completed training on powered industrial trucks prior to operating fork lifts in the work place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4262.5
- — Z (S) $8525
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $8,525 · Current $4,263 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): The employer is failing to protect employees from exposure to chemical hazards in the work place. This was most recently documented on January 8, 2019 at 1230 East 9th Street Minden, Nebraska. The employer failed to develop or implement a written hazard communication program that included information on the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) including pictograms, labeling, and training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4262.5
- — Z (S) $8525
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jun 3, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new chemical hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and safety data sheets. The employer is failing to protect employees from exposure to chemical hazard in the workplace. This was most recently documented on January 8, 2019 at 1230 East 9th Street Minden, Nebraska. The employer failed to train employees on the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) including pictograms, labeling, and training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Wardcraft Homes, INC.
View Wardcraft Homes, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321992)
More inspections in NE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343706503.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.