OSHA Inspection: FERNANDO SANABRIA

Issued

Jan 14, 2019

Abate by

Feb 12, 2019

Penalty

Initial $1,663 · Current $1,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)(a)      The employer had not developed a written hazard communication program for employees using a masonry saw to cut bricks and stones. Employees were potentially exposed to respirable crystalline silica.

Issued

Jan 14, 2019

Abate by

Feb 12, 2019

Penalty

Initial $1,663 · Current $500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.      At the construction site, the employer did not ensure that employees using a masonry saw to cut stones were provided eye protection.  Employees were exposed to being struck by flying objects.

Issued

Jan 14, 2019

Abate by

Feb 12, 2019

Penalty

Initial $1,663 · Current $500 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer shall fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.      At the construction site, the employer did not ensure that employees using a masonry saw to cut bricks were protected from being exposed to silica with the use of engineering controls, work practices and respiratory protection.

Issued

Jan 14, 2019

Abate by

Feb 12, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:   At the residential construction site, the employer did not assess the exposure for employees using a stationary masonry saw to cut bricks. Employees were potentially exposed to silica.