WESTPORT, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: AUSTIN GANIM LANDSCAPE DESIGN, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AUSTIN GANIM LANDSCAPE DESIGN, LLC in 7 POND EDGE ROAD, WESTPORT, CT 06880 (NAICS 561730). OSHA activity number 343713699.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AUSTIN GANIM LANDSCAPE DESIGN, LLC
- Site address
- 7 POND EDGE ROAD
- City
- WESTPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06880
- Mailing
- 320 KINGS HIGHWAY CUTOFF, FAIRFIELD, CT 06824
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561730
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,031 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person Jobsite: A competent person did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the trench / excavation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $3031
1926.651 K01
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): Daily inspections of excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems were not made by a competent person for evidence of a situation that could have resulted in possible cave-ins, indications of failure of protective systems. Jobsite: The employer did not ensure that the excavation had been inspected by a competent person prior to allowing the employees to enter and begin work.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.651 C02
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,031 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees: Jobsite: The employees forming a new retaining wall foundation in an excavation that ranged in depth of up to 6 feet 5 inches were not provided with a ladder or other safe means of egress.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $3031
1926.651 J02
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $2,650 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Protection was not provided by placing and keeping excavated or other materials or equipment at least 2 feet (.61m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that were sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both if necessary. Jobsite: The employees constructing the foundation of a new retaining wall were not protected from the hazard of cave-in due to the spoil pile not being placed greater than 2 feet away from the edge of the excavation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2650
- · Z (S) $3789
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $2,650 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652 (b) or (c). Jobsite: The employees forming a new retaining wall foundation in an excavation that ranged in depth up to 7 feet were not protected from cave-ins by an adequate cave-in protection system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2650
- · Z (S) $3789
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Feb 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $758 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300-A Form or equivalent for recordable injuries and illinesses. Jobsite: The employer did not maintain OSHA 300, Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses or the OSHA 300-A, Summary of Work-Related injuries and illnesses.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $500
- · Z (O) $758
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561730)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343713699.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.