PROSPER, TX —
OSHA Inspection: VICENTE RODRIGUEZ VILLANUEVA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VICENTE RODRIGUEZ VILLANUEVA in 1671 CASCADES CT., PROSPER, TX 75078 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343713905.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VICENTE RODRIGUEZ VILLANUEVA
- Site address
- 1671 CASCADES CT.
- City
- PROSPER
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75078
- Mailing
- 11611 FERGUSON RD. #2913, DALLAS, TX 75228
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.25 A
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form or scrap lumber with protruding nails was not kept clear from work areas: (a) Throughout the jobsite, employees were exposed to lumber containing protruding nails. Employees were exposed to laceration hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1705
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: (a) Throughout the jobsite the employees were exposed falling and flying objects. Employees were not provided with protective helmets.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1705
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. (a) Throughout the jobsite, employees using pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye or face injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a) Rooftop of the jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 9-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify fall protection training by preparing a written certification record. (a) At the jobsite the employees were exposed to fall hazards when performing roofing work. No written certification record for fall protection training existed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2019
- Abate by
- Feb 20, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. (a) Northside of the jobsite, a portable extension ladder was used to access the upper landing surface of the residential home under construction. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 9-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2273
More inspections at Vicente Rodriguez Villanueva
View Vicente Rodriguez Villanueva's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343713905.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.