Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VICENTE RODRIGUEZ VILLANUEVA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VICENTE RODRIGUEZ VILLANUEVA in 1671 CASCADES CT., PROSPER, TX 75078 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343713905.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vicente Rodriguez Villanueva — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vicente Rodriguez Villanueva is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1671 CASCADES CT.
City
PROSPER
State
TX
ZIP
75078
Mailing
11611 FERGUSON RD. #2913, DALLAS, TX 75228
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2019
Abate by
Feb 20, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form or scrap lumber with protruding nails was not kept clear from work areas:  (a) Throughout the jobsite, employees were exposed to lumber containing protruding nails. Employees were exposed to laceration hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1705

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2019
Abate by
Feb 20, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  (a) Throughout the jobsite the employees were exposed falling and flying objects. Employees were not provided with protective helmets.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1705

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2019
Abate by
Feb 20, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.   (a) Throughout the jobsite, employees using pneumatic nail guns were not protected from eye or face injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2019
Abate by
Feb 20, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   (a) Rooftop of the jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 9-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2019
Abate by
Feb 20, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify fall protection training by preparing a written certification record.  (a) At the jobsite the employees were exposed to fall hazards when performing roofing work. No written certification record for fall protection training existed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2019
Abate by
Feb 20, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.    (a) Northside of the jobsite, a portable extension ladder was used to access the upper landing surface of the residential home under construction. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of 9-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

View Vicente Rodriguez Villanueva's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343713905.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.