Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: REDLINE LUM TRONIX, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of REDLINE LUM TRONIX, INC. in 3420 D'IBERVILLE BLVD., OCEAN SPRINGS, MS 39564 (NAICS 336320). OSHA activity number 343740213.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Redline LUM Tronix, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Redline LUM Tronix, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3420 D'IBERVILLE BLVD.
City
OCEAN SPRINGS
State
MS
ZIP
39564
Mailing
3420 D'IBERVILLE BLVD., OCEAN SPRINGS, MS 39564
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336320
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 17, 2019
Abate by
Jul 17, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,364 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge:  (a)  Assembly Area - On or about January 24, 2019, the employer exposed the employees to a fire hazard as a result of a locked exit.  (b)  Prep Area - On or about January 24, 2019, the employer exposed the employees to a fire hazard as a result of a locked exit.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1363.8
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 17, 2019
Abate by
Jul 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,364 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) Facility - On or about January 24, 2019, the employer did not provide employees that were required to wear respiratory protection a written respiratory protection program governing the usage of a 3M, negative pressure, half mask, air purifying respirator used in the workplace exposing employees to respirable hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1363.8
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 17, 2019
Abate by
Jul 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) Facility - On or about January 24, 2019, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation for employees required to use a 3M, negative pressure, half mask, air purifying respirator in the workplace, exposing employees to respiratory system hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 17, 2019
Abate by
Jul 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) Facility - On or about January 24, 2019, the employer did not ensure employees using a 3M, negative pressure, half mask, air purifying respirator were provide a fit test to ensure the respirator would properly fit and prevent employee exposure to respirable hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 17, 2019
Abate by
Jul 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable, and effective annual training to employees who were required to use respirators.  (a)  Facility - On or about January 24, 2019, the employer did not provide the employees with adequate training for employees required to use a 3M, negative pressure, half mask, air purifying respirator exposing employees to respirable hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 17, 2019
Abate by
Jul 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,023 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) Facility - On or about January 24, 2019, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program providing adequate information to employees about chemicals they may be exposed to in the workplace such as but not limited to denatured alcohol, lacquer thinner, primer, catalyst, paints, and other hazardous chemicals, exposing employee to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1023
  • · Z (S) $1705

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 17, 2019
Abate by
Jul 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical:  (a)  Facility - On or about January 24, 2019, the employer did not maintain Safety Data Sheets for chemicals used in the workplace such as but not limited to denatured alcohol, lacquer thinner, primer, catalyst, paints, and other hazardous chemicals, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 17, 2019
Abate by
Jul 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a)  Facility - On or about January 24, 2019, the employer did not perform adequate training on the chemicals that employees may be exposed to in the workplace and the employer's exposure control methods for chemicals such as but not limited to denatured alcohol, lacquer thinner, primer, catalyst, paints, and other hazardous chemicals, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343740213.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.