Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VEEPAK OHIO, LLC

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of VEEPAK OHIO, LLC in 9040 SMITH'S MILL RD, NEW ALBANY, OH 43054 (NAICS 325620). OSHA activity number 343744116.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Veepak Ohio, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Veepak Ohio, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VEEPAK OHIO, LLC
Site address
9040 SMITH'S MILL RD
City
NEW ALBANY
State
OH
ZIP
43054
Mailing
9040 SMITH'S MILL RD, NEW ALBANY, OH 43054
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325620
Employees
320
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2019
Abate by
May 27, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,471 · Current $5,200 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer shall establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided in this paragraph by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.  a. The employer did not develop and implement an audiometric testing program for employees working in the south production area. A feeder employee working on line 202 was exposed to continuous noise at 75.05% on February 7, 2019, which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 87.9 dBA during the 478 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 2 minutes not sampled.  b. The employer did not develop and implement an audiometric testing program for employees working in the south production area. A feeder employee working on lines 207 and 203 was exposed to continuous noise at 103.1% on February 7, 2019, which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.2 dBA during the 450 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 30 minutes not sampled.  c. The employer did not develop and implement an audiometric testing program for employees working in the south production area. A down line production employee working on lines 205 and 206 was exposed to continuous noise at 71.52% on February 7, 2019, which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 87.5 dBA during the 450 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 30 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5199.6
  • — Z (S) $9471

1910.95 I03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2019
Abate by
Apr 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,471 · Current $5,200 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(i)(3): Employees shall be given the opportunity to select their hearing protectors from a variety of suitable hearing protectors provided by the employer.  a. The employer did not provide multiple types of hearing protection for employees working in the south production area. A feeder employee working on line 202 was exposed to continuous noise at 75.05% on February 7, 2019, which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 87.9 dBA during the 478 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 2 minutes not sampled.  b. The employer did not provide multiple types of hearing protection for employees working in the south production area. A feeder employee working on lines 207 and 203 was exposed to continuous noise at 103.1% on February 7, 2019, which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.2 dBA during the 450 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 30 minutes not sampled.  c. The employer did not provide multiple types of hearing protection for employees working in the south production area. A down line production employee working on lines 205 and 206 was exposed to continuous noise at 71.52% on February 7, 2019, which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 87.5 dBA during the 450 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 30 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5199.6
  • — Z (S) $9471

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2019
Abate by
May 27, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,471 · Current $5,200 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer shall train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of this section. The employer shall institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program.  a. The employer did not develop and implement a noise training program for employees working in the south production area. A feeder employee working on line 202 was exposed to continuous noise at 75.05% on February 7, 2019, which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 87.9 dBA during the 478 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 2 minutes not sampled.   b. The employer did not develop and implement a noise training program for employees working in the south production area. A feeder employee working on lines 207 and 203 was exposed to continuous noise at 103.1% on February 7, 2019, which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.2 dBA during the 450 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 30 minutes not sampled.   c. The employer did not develop and implement a noise training program for employees working in the south production area. A down line production employee working on lines 205 and 206 was exposed to continuous noise at 71.52% on February 7, 2019, which exceeded the action limit (AL) of 50%, an 8-hour TWA (time weighted average) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee's 8-hour TWA sound level was approximately 87.5 dBA during the 450 minute sampling period. Time weighted average includes a zero increment for the 30 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5199.6
  • — Z (S) $9471

View Veepak Ohio, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343744116.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.