ENTERPRISE, AL —
OSHA Inspection: SOUTHEAST MEMORIAL & VAULT, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SOUTHEAST MEMORIAL & VAULT, LLC in 1009 NORTH MAIN STREET, ENTERPRISE, AL 36330 (NAICS 327390). OSHA activity number 343755278.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SOUTHEAST MEMORIAL & VAULT, LLC
- Site address
- 1009 NORTH MAIN STREET
- City
- ENTERPRISE
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 36330
- Mailing
- PO BOX 310786, ENTERPRISE, AL 36331
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327390
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $1,500 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a) Sandblasting Cabinet Area: On or about February 26, 2019 an employee was exposed to noise dose at levels of 87.8 % (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 89 dBA) which is 1.76 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85 dBA) while abrasive blasting. Results were calculated for a 377 minute sampling period. The employer failed to implement an effective Hearing Conservation Program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2842
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: a) Sandblasting Cabinet Area: On or about February 26, 2019 an employee was exposed to noise dose at levels of 87.8 % (equivalent to 89 dBA) which is 1.76 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85 dBA) while abrasive blasting. Results were calculated for a 377 minute sampling period. The employer failed to establish and maintain an audiometric testing program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: a) Sandblasting Cabinet Area: On or about February 26, 2019 an employee was exposed to noise dose at levels of 87.8 % (equivalent to 89 dBA) which is 1.76 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85 dBA) while abrasive blasting. Results were calculated for a 377 minute sampling period. The employer failed to institute a training program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,000 Reduced
90009010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Sandblasting Cabinet Area: On or about January 24, 2019 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to health hazards from requiring use of a respirator and do not have a written respiratory protection program to include annual fit tests, medical evaluations and training on respirators and respirator care, maintenance and storage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2273
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
90009010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Sandblasting area: On or about January 24, 2019 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to health hazards from required use of a respirator during sand blasting with silica sand and do not have a medical evaluation conducted prior to initial use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
90009010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) Sandblasting Cabinet Area: On or about January 24, 2019 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to hazards from required use of a respirator during sand blasting with silica sand and did not ensure fit testing was conducted prior to initial use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
90009010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: a) Sandblasting Cabinet Area: On or about January 24, 2019 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to hazards from required use of a respirator during sand blasting with silica sand and did not ensure training on storage and cleaning of respirators was conducted.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
90009010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: a) Sandblasting Cabinet Area: On or about January 24, 2019 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to health hazards from required use of a respirator during sand blasting with silica sand and did not trained employees on the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.244 B
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.244(b): Abrasive blast cleaning nozzle(s) were not equipped with an operating valve which had to be held open manually: a) Sandblasting cabinet area: On or about February 26, 2019 and time prior to the employer exposed employee(s) to struck by hazards from the sandblasting nozzle, line and sand by not having a dead man type shut off or automatic pressure shut off switch/lever on the nozzle or machine.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $1705
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,000 Reduced
90009010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Facility wide: On or about January 24, 2019 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that employees were exposed to chemical such as but not limited to the following: silica. Employees were exposed while conducting sandblasting job tasks and the employer did not ensure a written hazard communication program was implemented at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $2842
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
90009010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet: a) Facility wide: On or about January 24, 2019 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that employees were exposed to chemical such as but not limited to the following: silica. Employees were exposed while conducting sandblasting job tasks and the employer did not ensure a chemical inventory list was available at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: a) Facility wide: On or about January 24, 2019 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that employees were exposed to chemical such as but not limited to the following: silica. Employees were exposed while conducting sandblasting job tasks and the employer did not ensure safety data sheets were available at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
90009010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a)Facility wide: On or about January 24, 2019 and at times prior to, the employer exposed employees to chemical hazards in that employees were exposed to chemical such as but not limited to silica. Employees were exposed while conducting sandblasting job tasks and the employer did not ensure a training was conducted on hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.28 B11 II
- Issued
- Apr 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(11)(ii): Each flight of stairs having at least 3 treads and at least 4 risers was not equipped with stair rail systems and handrails as required in Table D-2 of this standard: a) Shop to office stair system: On or about January 24, 2019 and time prior to the employer exposed employee(s) to fall hazards up to 36 inches in that the fixed stair system did not have standard railing on the stairs that had 6 risers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Southeast Memorial & Vault, LLC
View Southeast Memorial & Vault, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327390)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343755278.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.