Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: RS STONE WORKS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RS STONE WORKS, LLC in 256 PR 8571, WINNSBORO, TX 75494 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 343766390.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RS Stone Works, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RS Stone Works, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RS STONE WORKS, LLC
Site address
256 PR 8571
City
WINNSBORO
State
TX
ZIP
75494
Mailing
256 PR 8571, WINNSBORO, TX 75494
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,304 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck:    (a) In the production and shipping areas, employees operated a forklift without having first completed a training program consisting of formal instruction, practical training, and evaluation of performance in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2500
  • · Z (S) $5304

1910.178 M02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,789 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(2): Employee(s) stood under or passed under the elevated portion of a powered industrial truck(s):    (a) In the shipping area, employees worked under the elevated portion of a forklift during a wrapping operation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3789

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,789 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    (a) The employer did not verify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification.  In the mixing and tamping areas, employees were exposed to eye hazards when mixing portland cement and when using compressed air for cleaning.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3789

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  (a) In the mixing area, employees did not wear eye protection when exposed to eye contact hazards from portland cement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.213 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,789 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1): Circular handfed ripsaw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:    (a) In the production area, a table saw used for cutting wood molds was not equipped with an automatically adjusting hood.  An employee was not protected from contacting the saw blade.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3789

1910.213 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(2): Hand-fed circular ripsaw(s) were not furnished with a spreader to prevent material from squeezing the saw or being thrown back on the operator:  (a) In the production area, a table saw used for cutting wood molds was not furnished with a spreader.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.213 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(3): Hand-fed ripsaw(s) was not provided with nonkickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator:  (a) In the production area, a table saw used for cutting wood molds was not provided with nonkickback fingers or dogs.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,031 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. and effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment was not used:    (a) In the tamping area, compressed air used for cleaning had a dead end pressure of greater than 30 psi.    (b) In the tamping area, compressed air was used for cleaning and employees did not wear eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3031

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a) The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program for employees who were exposed to hazardous chemicals including portland cement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 1, 2019
Abate by
May 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  (a) In the mixing area, safety data sheets were not readily accessible for employees using hazardous chemicals, including portland cement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343766390.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.