EAST RUTHERFORD, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: D&L GROUP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of D&L GROUP in 324 HOBOKEN AVENUE, EAST RUTHERFORD, NJ 07073 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 343769543.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- D&L GROUP
- Site address
- 324 HOBOKEN AVENUE
- City
- EAST RUTHERFORD
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07073
- Mailing
- 39-19 MORLOT AVENUE, FAIR LAWN, NJ 07410
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236116
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 13, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) Front of Building, Ground: Employee was exposed to struck by hazards while working under an employee who was working on the roof, without the use of a hard hat, on or about 2/8/19.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 13, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) Front of Building, Roof: Employee was exposed to fall hazards in excess of 12 feet while working on installing siding without the use of guard rails, safety nets, personal fall arrest system or other feasible means of fall protection, on or about 2/8/19.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Mar 13, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) Front of Building, Roof: Employee was exposed to fall hazards in excess of 12 feet while using an extension ladder to access the roof that did not extend 3 feet past the edge of the roof, on or about 2/8/19.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Mar 13, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders shall be used only for the purpose for which they were designed. a) Front of Building, Roof: Employee was exposed to fall hazards in excess of 12 feet while working on installing siding on an "A" framed ladder in the closed position on a roof, on or about 2/8/19.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3978
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236116)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343769543.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.