Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: R&A AUTO BODY, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of R&A AUTO BODY, INC. in 104 TENNENT ROAD, MORGANVILLE, NJ 07751 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 343770327.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch R&A Auto Body, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for R&A Auto Body, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
R&A AUTO BODY, INC.
Site address
104 TENNENT ROAD
City
MORGANVILLE
State
NJ
ZIP
07751
Mailing
104 TENNENT ROAD, MORGANVILLE, NJ 07751
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
12
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2019
Abate by
Sep 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $425 · Current $425
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  a) 104 Tennent Road, Morganville, NJ: The employer failed to provide the area office with abatement documentation of all citations issued on July 29th, 2019.   ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $425

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2019
Abate by
Nov 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 1910.134(c)(1)(i)-(ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   a) Production floor: A site specific written respiratory protection program that included information such as, but not limited to training, storage, and maintenance of respirators, was not established for employee(s) wearing 3M brand full faced respirators with organic vapor cartridges when involved in spraying operations as of 2/8/19.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2019
Abate by
Nov 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or was required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Facility: The employer did not ensure that operator(s) required to wear tight-fitting negative pressure respirators during spraying operations were provided a medical evaluation prior to their use of respirators as of 2/8/2019.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343770327.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.