MORGANVILLE, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: R&A AUTO BODY, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of R&A AUTO BODY, INC. in 104 TENNENT ROAD, MORGANVILLE, NJ 07751 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 343770327.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- R&A AUTO BODY, INC.
- Site address
- 104 TENNENT ROAD
- City
- MORGANVILLE
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07751
- Mailing
- 104 TENNENT ROAD, MORGANVILLE, NJ 07751
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Sep 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $425 · Current $425
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a) 104 Tennent Road, Morganville, NJ: The employer failed to provide the area office with abatement documentation of all citations issued on July 29th, 2019. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $425
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 1910.134(c)(1)(i)-(ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) Production floor: A site specific written respiratory protection program that included information such as, but not limited to training, storage, and maintenance of respirators, was not established for employee(s) wearing 3M brand full faced respirators with organic vapor cartridges when involved in spraying operations as of 2/8/19.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2273
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or was required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Facility: The employer did not ensure that operator(s) required to wear tight-fitting negative pressure respirators during spraying operations were provided a medical evaluation prior to their use of respirators as of 2/8/2019.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343770327.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.