Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: NEW ENGLAND TRUCK AND AUTO SHINE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of NEW ENGLAND TRUCK AND AUTO SHINE, INC. in 125 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, NORTH SMITHFIELD, RI 02896 (NAICS 423110). OSHA activity number 343770640.

Watch NEW England Truck AND Auto Shine, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for NEW England Truck AND Auto Shine, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
125 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
City
NORTH SMITHFIELD
State
RI
ZIP
02896
Mailing
125 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, NORTH SMITHFIELD, RI 02896
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423110
Employees
53
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Feb 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $4,508 · Current $2,254 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tank-cars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6:   (a) Worksite   On or about 2/8/2019, the employer did not ensure that six compressed gas cylinders, positioned in a congested area at an overhead door, were secured from being knocked over and protected from objects striking them.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2254
  • — Z (S) $4508

1910.110 F02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Feb 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.110(f)(2)(ii): LP gas containers stored inside were located near or in areas normally used or intended for the safe exit of employees.   (a) Worksite   On or about 2/8/2019, the employer did not ensure that LP gas containers were stored away from overhead doors that may be used by employees as a safe exit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
May 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $6,763 · Current $3,382 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   (a) Worksite   On or about 2/8/2019, the employer did not ensure that employees who were issued tight-fitting half mask respirators for painting, sanding, grinding and truck washing activities, were medically evaluated to determine their ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3381.5
  • — Z (S) $6763

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
May 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employees using a tight-fitting face-piece respirator were not annually fit tested:   (a) Worksite   On or about 2/8/2019, the employer did not ensure that employees utilizing tight-fitting half mask respirators received an annual quantitative or qualitative fit test. Recently hired employees were issued a tight-fitting half mask respirator without any fit test at all.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
May 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of why the respirator was necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance could compromise the protective effect of the respirator:   (a) Worksite   On or about 2/8/2019, the employer did not ensure that all employees received proper training in respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Apr 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,635 · Current $2,818 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:   (a) Worksite   On or about 2/8/2019, the employer did not ensure that the eyewash station was located in the immediate location (within 10 seconds) of the hazardous work activity requiring it, and that the eyewash station was unobstructed from employees reaching its location by other shop work activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2817.5
  • — Z (S) $5635

1910.1200 F06 II

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Feb 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,635 · Current $2,818 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.   (a) Worksite   On or about 2/8/2019, the employer did not ensure that secondary containers (spray bottles and backpacks) of Fleet Aluminum Brightener (acid solution), were labeled in accordance with the requirements of the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2817.5
  • — Z (S) $5635

1910.178 A06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Apr 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $632 · Current $316 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition:   (a) Worksite   On or about 2/8/2019, the employer did not ensure that the Caterpillar forklift data plate was maintained in a legible condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $316
  • — Z (O) $632

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 19, 2019
Abate by
Feb 22, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:   (a) Worksite   On or about 2/8/2019, the employer did not ensure that Powered Industrial Trucks were inspected prior to use, each day.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343770640.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.